Department of Biological Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59357. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059357. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
Several species of the insect pathogenic fungus Metarhizium are associated with certain plant types and genome analyses suggested a bifunctional lifestyle; as an insect pathogen and as a plant symbiont. Here we wanted to explore whether there was more variation in genes devoted to plant association (Mad2) or to insect association (Mad1) overall in the genus Metarhizium. Greater divergence within the genus Metarhizium in one of these genes may provide evidence for whether host insect or plant is a driving force in adaptation and evolution in the genus Metarhizium. We compared differences in variation in the insect adhesin gene, Mad1, which enables attachment to insect cuticle, and the plant adhesin gene, Mad2, which enables attachment to plants. Overall variation for the Mad1 promoter region (7.1%), Mad1 open reading frame (6.7%), and Mad2 open reading frame (7.4%) were similar, while it was higher in the Mad2 promoter region (9.9%). Analysis of the transcriptional elements within the Mad2 promoter region revealed variable STRE, PDS, degenerative TATA box, and TATA box-like regions, while this level of variation was not found for Mad1. Sequences were also phylogenetically compared to EF-1α, which is used for species identification, in 14 isolates representing 7 different species in the genus Metarhizium. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that the Mad2 phylogeny is more congruent with 5' EF-1α than Mad1. This would suggest that Mad2 has diverged among Metarhizium lineages, contributing to clade- and species-specific variation, while it appears that Mad1 has been largely conserved. While other abiotic and biotic factors cannot be excluded in contributing to divergence, these results suggest that plant relationships, rather than insect host, have been a major driving factor in the divergence of the genus Metarhizium.
几种昆虫病原真菌绿僵菌与某些植物类型相关联,基因组分析表明其具有双重生活方式;既是昆虫病原体,也是植物共生体。在这里,我们想探讨在绿僵菌属中,与植物相关的基因(Mad2)或与昆虫相关的基因(Mad1)是否存在更多的变异。如果在该属中,一个基因的变异程度更大,可能会为宿主昆虫或植物是否是适应和进化的驱动力提供证据。我们比较了昆虫附着基因 Mad1 的变异差异,Mad1 使昆虫能够附着在昆虫表皮上,以及植物附着基因 Mad2 的变异差异,Mad2 使昆虫能够附着在植物上。Mad1 启动子区(7.1%)、Mad1 开放阅读框(6.7%)和 Mad2 开放阅读框(7.4%)的总体变异相似,而 Mad2 启动子区(9.9%)的变异较高。Mad2 启动子区转录因子的分析显示了可变的 STRE、PDS、退化 TATA 盒和 TATA 盒样区,而 Mad1 则没有这种变异。还对代表绿僵菌属 7 个不同种的 14 个分离株的 Mad2 序列与 EF-1α进行了系统发育比较,EF-1α用于物种鉴定。系统发育分析表明,Mad2 系统发育与 5' EF-1α比 Mad1 更一致。这表明 Mad2 在绿僵菌谱系中已经发生了分歧,导致了分支和种特异性的变异,而 Mad1 似乎已经被大量保存。虽然不能排除其他非生物和生物因素对分化的贡献,但这些结果表明,植物关系而不是昆虫宿主是绿僵菌属分化的主要驱动因素。