Suppr超能文献

Queckenstedt 试验对大鼠的影响不仅局限于颈静脉淤血。

Queckenstedt's test affects more than jugular venous congestion in rat.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59409. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059409. Epub 2013 Mar 13.

Abstract

Jugular venous compression by the Queckenstedt's test (Q-test) increases the intracranial pressure, but the effects of isolated jugular venous congestion are not well known. Intraventricular pressure (IVP) was compared during direct obstruction of the common jugular veins (bilateral CJV clipping) and during external compression of bilateral CJV flows (Q-test) in a rat model. Intracerebroventricular catheters were inserted into the right lateral ventricle of nine male Sprague-Dawley rats (371.1±44.8 g, 82.2±12.0 days old). The initial mean IVP, arterial pressure (MAP), and pulse rate were 2.8±1.3 mmHg, 88.8±12.7 mmHg, and 348.3±69.1 beats/min, respectively. The mean IVP increment and MAP decrement were 6.5±2.5 and 13.5±5.7 mmHg, respectively, during the Q-test, compared to 2.3±1.5 and 7.3±3.8 mmHg, respectively, during bilateral CJV clipping (all p = 0.008). The IVP increment and MAP decrement were greater during the Q-test than during bilateral CJV clipping (p = 0.008 and p = 0.038). Although the Q-test and bilateral CJV clipping showed similar effects, the response with the Q-test was greater. Thus, the Q-test appears to obstruct other collateral cerebral veins in addition to bilateral CJV flows. Since this model revealed significant differences between the manual Q-test and bilateral CJV clipping, the finding should be taken into account in future studies on the Q-test in SD rats.

摘要

压迫颈静脉奎肯氏试验(Q 试验)增加颅内压,但孤立的颈静脉充血的影响尚不清楚。在大鼠模型中,比较了直接阻塞颈总静脉(双侧 CJV 夹闭)和双侧 CJV 血流外部压迫(Q 试验)期间的脑室压(IVP)。将脑室内导管插入 9 只雄性 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠(371.1±44.8 g,82.2±12.0 天龄)的右侧侧脑室。初始平均 IVP、动脉压(MAP)和脉搏率分别为 2.8±1.3 mmHg、88.8±12.7 mmHg 和 348.3±69.1 次/分。与双侧 CJV 夹闭(分别为 2.3±1.5 mmHg 和 7.3±3.8 mmHg)相比,Q 试验期间平均 IVP 升高和 MAP 降低分别为 6.5±2.5 和 13.5±5.7 mmHg(均 p=0.008)。与双侧 CJV 夹闭(均 p=0.008 和 p=0.038)相比,Q 试验期间 IVP 升高和 MAP 降低更大。虽然 Q 试验和双侧 CJV 夹闭显示出相似的效果,但 Q 试验的反应更大。因此,Q 试验似乎除了双侧 CJV 血流外,还会阻塞其他侧支脑静脉。由于该模型显示 Q 试验与双侧 CJV 夹闭之间存在显著差异,因此在未来的 Q 试验在 SD 大鼠中的研究中应考虑到这一发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0453/3596343/df280b5bc75d/pone.0059409.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验