Breast Cancer Prevention Center, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, United States.
Reprod Biol. 2013 Mar;13(1):75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.repbio.2013.01.179. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
Ductal lavage (DL) and random periareolar fine needle aspiration (RPFNA) have both been proposed as minimally invasive techniques to sample breast tissue during breast cancer prevention trials. Laser capture microdissection (LCM), linear RNA amplification and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) theoretically overcome the limitations of small specimen size obtained with DL and RPFNA. In order to test the yield, relative stability and amplifiability of RNA from fixed and archived RPFNA and DL specimens, breast tissue was sampled from individual high risk women (n=9) by both DL and RPFNA. RPFNA samples showed good RNA/cDNA yield and amplification while only 2 of 9 of the paired DL specimens had cDNA of adequate quality for subsequent PCR. One and two rounds of linear amplification provided approximately a 200- and 20,000-fold enrichment of RNA, respectively. PCR analysis consistently detected ER and COX-1 mRNA in the majority of RPFNA samples examined while pS2, PCNA, VEGF and survivin expression varied with subject. RNA yield and/or stability was greater for fixed and archived RPFNA than DL specimens of breast tissue. In a subsequent study examining an expanded biomarker gene panel in fixed vs. frozen RPFNA samples, mRNA profiles and ranked relative mRNA abundance were similar (r=0.89) for frozen and fixed RPFNA specimens. In summary, frozen RPFNA samples may be optimal for RNA endpoints in human breast cancer prevention trials but fixed RPFNA specimens allow similar analyses with greater convenience.
导管灌洗术(DL)和随机乳晕旁细针抽吸术(RPFNA)均被提议作为微创技术,用于在乳腺癌预防试验中取样乳腺组织。激光捕获显微切割(LCM)、线性 RNA 扩增和实时定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)理论上克服了 DL 和 RPFNA 获得的小标本量的局限性。为了测试固定和存档的 RPFNA 和 DL 标本中 RNA 的产量、相对稳定性和扩增性,对 9 名高危女性个体进行了 DL 和 RPFNA 采样。RPFNA 样本显示出良好的 RNA/cDNA 产量和扩增,而 9 个配对的 DL 标本中仅有 2 个具有足够质量的 cDNA 用于后续 PCR。线性扩增 1 轮和 2 轮分别提供了大约 200 倍和 20,000 倍的 RNA 富集。PCR 分析一致检测到大多数 RPFNA 样本中的 ER 和 COX-1 mRNA,而 pS2、PCNA、VEGF 和 survivin 的表达随个体而异。与 DL 标本相比,固定和存档的 RPFNA 标本的 RNA 产量和/或稳定性更高。在随后的研究中,对固定与冷冻 RPFNA 样本中的扩展生物标志物基因进行了检测,发现固定和冷冻 RPFNA 样本的 mRNA 图谱和相对 mRNA 丰度的排名相似(r=0.89)。总之,冷冻 RPFNA 样本可能是人类乳腺癌预防试验中 RNA 终点的最佳选择,但固定 RPFNA 标本允许更方便地进行类似分析。