Suppr超能文献

预后评分系统在接受放射外科治疗的脑转移瘤患者中的临床应用。

The clinical utility of prognostic scoring systems in patients with brain metastases treated with radiosurgery.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Radiother Oncol. 2013 Mar;106(3):370-4. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.01.015. Epub 2013 Mar 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification is the gold standard for assessing the prognosis of patients with brain metastases (BM). Newer prognostic scoring systems for BM patients have been proposed, but their superiority over RPA needs to be established for patients treated with radiosurgery.

METHODS

380 patients with 1-3 BM were treated at the VUmc with radiosurgery (RS) from 2002 to 2011. Using baseline characteristics, patient scores were calculated for RPA, the Rotterdam-system, the score index for radiosurgery (SIR), the basic score for BM (BSBM), the graded prognostic assessment (GPA), the diagnosis-specific GPA, the Rades score, and the Golden grading system (GGS) for comparison with survival time and survival classification (≤3 months or ≥12 months).

RESULTS

Median survival after RS was 7.7 months, with 3-month and 1-year overall survival (OS) of 76% and 39%, respectively. Multivariate analysis confirmed the prognostic value of performance status, age, absence of extracranial metastases, primary tumor site, gender, and steroid response for OS. The percentage of patients included within the intermediate prognostic classes ranged from 48% to 77%, and was 64% for the RPA. All scoring systems highly correlated with OS (p<0.001). The specificity for predicting early death ranged from 85% to 98% (RPA 88%), with the unfavorable classes of Rades, GGS, BSBM and SIR performing best. The sensitivity for predicting long-term survival ranged from 10% to 69% (RPA 29%), and was highest for the favorable classes of Rades and GGS.

CONCLUSIONS

All prognostic scoring systems correlated very well with OS. All scores shared the limitation of unbalanced proportions of patients within the prognostic classes. As the clinical superiority of more recently developed prognostic scoring systems was only modest in predicting early death and long term survival, the well-known and easy to use RPA system currently remains the standard.

摘要

目的

RTOG 递归分区分析(RPA)分类是评估脑转移瘤(BM)患者预后的金标准。已经提出了用于 BM 患者的新的预后评分系统,但需要为接受放射外科治疗的患者建立其优于 RPA 的优越性。

方法

380 名 1-3 个 BM 的患者于 2002 年至 2011 年在 VUmc 接受放射外科治疗(RS)。使用基线特征,为 RPA、鹿特丹系统、放射外科评分指数(SIR)、BM 基本评分(BSBM)、分级预后评估(GPA)、诊断特定 GPA、Rades 评分和 Golden 分级系统(GGS)计算患者评分,以与生存时间和生存分类(≤3 个月或≥12 个月)进行比较。

结果

RS 后中位生存时间为 7.7 个月,3 个月和 1 年总生存率(OS)分别为 76%和 39%。多变量分析证实了功能状态、年龄、无颅外转移、原发肿瘤部位、性别和类固醇反应对 OS 的预后价值。处于中间预后等级的患者比例范围为 48%至 77%,RPA 为 64%。所有评分系统与 OS 高度相关(p<0.001)。预测早期死亡的特异性范围为 85%至 98%(RPA 为 88%),Rades、GGS、BSBM 和 SIR 的不利等级表现最佳。预测长期生存的敏感性范围为 10%至 69%(RPA 为 29%),Rades 和 GGS 的有利等级最高。

结论

所有预后评分系统与 OS 相关性非常好。所有评分系统都存在预后等级内患者比例不平衡的局限性。由于最近开发的预后评分系统在预测早期死亡和长期生存方面的临床优势仅略有改善,因此广为人知且易于使用的 RPA 系统目前仍然是标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验