Unit of Epidemiology and Global Health, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umea University, Umea, Sweden.
Implement Sci. 2013 Mar 23;8:36. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-36.
Despite the existence of ample literature dealing, on the one hand, with the integration of innovations within health systems and team learning, and, on the other hand, with different aspects of the detection and management of intimate partner violence (IPV) within healthcare facilities, research that explores how health innovations that go beyond biomedical issues-such as IPV management-get integrated into health systems, and that focuses on healthcare teams' learning processes is, to the best of our knowledge, very scarce if not absent. This realist evaluation protocol aims to ascertain: why, how, and under what circumstances primary healthcare teams engage (if at all) in a learning process to integrate IPV management in their practices; and why, how, and under what circumstances team learning processes lead to the development of organizational culture and values regarding IPV management, and the delivery of IPV management services.
This study will be conducted in Spain using a multiple-case study design. Data will be collected from selected cases (primary healthcare teams) through different methods: individual and group interviews, routinely collected statistical data, documentary review, and observation. Cases will be purposively selected in order to enable testing the initial middle-range theory (MRT). After in-depth exploration of a limited number of cases, additional cases will be chosen for their ability to contribute to refining the emerging MRT to explain how primary healthcare learn to integrate intimate partner violence management.
Evaluations of health sector responses to IPV are scarce, and even fewer focus on why, how, and when the healthcare services integrate IPV management. There is a consensus that healthcare professionals and healthcare teams play a key role in this integration, and that training is important in order to realize changes. However, little is known about team learning of IPV management, both in terms of how to trigger such learning and how team learning is connected with changes in organizational culture and values, and in service delivery. This realist evaluation protocol aims to contribute to this knowledge by conducting this project in a country, Spain, where great endeavours have been made towards the integration of IPV management within the health system.
尽管有大量文献探讨了一方面将创新融入卫生系统和团队学习,另一方面在医疗机构中发现和管理亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的不同方面,但针对超越生物医学问题的健康创新(例如 IPV 管理)如何融入卫生系统的研究,以及关注医疗保健团队的学习过程的研究,据我们所知,如果不是缺乏的话,也是非常少的。本真实评价方案旨在确定:初级保健团队(如果有的话)为什么、如何以及在何种情况下参与将 IPV 管理纳入其实践的学习过程;以及团队学习过程为什么、如何以及在何种情况下导致关于 IPV 管理的组织文化和价值观的发展,并提供 IPV 管理服务。
本研究将在西班牙使用多案例研究设计进行。将通过不同的方法从选定的案例(初级保健团队)中收集数据:个人和小组访谈、常规收集的统计数据、文件审查和观察。将有针对性地选择案例,以便能够测试初始中观理论(MRT)。在对有限数量的案例进行深入探索之后,将选择其他案例,以其对完善新兴 MRT 以解释初级保健如何学习整合亲密伴侣暴力管理的能力。
评估卫生部门对 IPV 的反应的研究很少,而且很少关注医疗保健服务为何、如何以及何时整合 IPV 管理。人们普遍认为,医疗保健专业人员和医疗保健团队在这方面发挥着关键作用,培训对于实现变革很重要。然而,对于 IPV 管理的团队学习,无论是在触发这种学习的方式,还是在团队学习与组织文化和价值观的变化以及服务提供方面的联系方面,都知之甚少。本真实评价方案旨在通过在西班牙开展该项目来为这方面的知识做出贡献,西班牙在将 IPV 管理纳入卫生系统方面做出了巨大努力。