• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学专业院校招生流程概述以及招生决策中对申请人数据的运用:自 20 世纪 80 年代以来发生了哪些变化?

An overview of the medical school admission process and use of applicant data in decision making: what has changed since the 1980s?

机构信息

Educational Affairs, University of South Florida Health Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2013 May;88(5):672-81. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828bf252.

DOI:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828bf252
PMID:23524917
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate current medical school admission processes and whether they differ from those in 1986 when they were last reviewed by the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC).

METHOD

In spring 2008, admission deans from all MD-granting U.S. and Canadian medical schools using the Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) were invited to complete an online survey that asked participants to describe their institution's admission process and to report the use and rate the importance of applicant data in making decisions at each stage.

RESULTS

The 120 responding admission officers reported using a variety of data to make decisions. Most indicated using interviews to assess applicants' personal characteristics. Compared with 1986, there was an increase in the emphasis placed on academic data during pre-interview screening. While GPA data were among the most important data in decision making at all stages in 1986, data use and importance varied by the stage of the process in 2008: MCAT scores and undergraduate GPAs were rated as the most important data for deciding whom to invite to submit secondary applications and interview, whereas interview recommendations and letters of recommendation were rated as the most important data in deciding whom to accept.

CONCLUSIONS

This study underscores the complexity of the medical school admission process and suggests increased use of a holistic approach that considers the whole applicant when making admission decisions. Findings will inform AAMC initiatives focused on transforming admission processes.

摘要

目的

调查当前医学院的招生流程,以及它们是否与 1986 年最后一次由美国医学院协会(AAMC)审查时有所不同。

方法

2008 年春季,邀请所有使用医学研究生入学考试(MCAT)的美国和加拿大的医学院招生院长完成在线调查,要求参与者描述其机构的招生流程,并报告在决策的每个阶段使用和评估申请人数据的重要性。

结果

120 名参与的招生官员报告了使用各种数据来做出决策。大多数人表示通过面试来评估申请人的个人特征。与 1986 年相比,在面试前筛选阶段更加重视学术数据。虽然在 1986 年,在所有阶段的决策中,绩点数据都是最重要的数据之一,但在 2008 年,数据的使用和重要性因流程的阶段而异:MCAT 分数和本科绩点被评为决定邀请谁提交次要申请和面试的最重要的数据,而面试推荐和推荐信则被评为决定录取谁的最重要的数据。

结论

本研究强调了医学院招生流程的复杂性,并表明在做出招生决策时,更多地采用整体方法来考虑整个申请人。研究结果将为 AAMC 关注招生流程改革的倡议提供信息。

相似文献

1
An overview of the medical school admission process and use of applicant data in decision making: what has changed since the 1980s?医学专业院校招生流程概述以及招生决策中对申请人数据的运用:自 20 世纪 80 年代以来发生了哪些变化?
Acad Med. 2013 May;88(5):672-81. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828bf252.
2
Core personal competencies important to entering students' success in medical school: what are they and how could they be assessed early in the admission process?对医学生成功至关重要的核心个人能力有哪些:它们是什么,以及如何在招生过程早期进行评估?
Acad Med. 2013 May;88(5):603-13. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828b3389.
3
The influence of MCAT and GPA preadmission academic metrics on interview scores.MCAT 和 GPA 入学前学术指标对面试成绩的影响。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018 Mar;23(1):151-158. doi: 10.1007/s10459-017-9779-9. Epub 2017 May 13.
4
Have rural background students been disadvantaged by the medical school admission process?具有农村背景的学生在医学院录取过程中是否处于不利地位?
Med Educ. 2008 May;42(5):476-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02938.x. Epub 2008 Mar 14.
5
Redesigning the MCAT exam: balancing multiple perspectives.重新设计 MCAT 考试:平衡多方观点。
Acad Med. 2013 May;88(5):560-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828c4ae0.
6
Should efforts in favor of medical student diversity be focused during admissions or farther upstream?支持医学生多样性的努力应该集中在招生阶段还是更早的阶段?
Acad Med. 2012 Apr;87(4):443-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318248f7f3.
7
Should the MCAT exam be used for medical school admissions in Canada?加拿大的医学院入学应该采用 MCAT 考试吗?
Acad Med. 2013 May;88(5):572-80. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828b85af.
8
Multiple mini-interviews versus traditional interviews: stakeholder acceptability comparison.多轮迷你面试与传统面试:利益相关者可接受性比较。
Med Educ. 2009 Oct;43(10):993-1000. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03447.x.
9
The applicant pool: the genesis of the physician pipeline.申请人库:医生人才输送渠道的起源。
J Ky Med Assoc. 2008 Jun;106(6):263-9.
10
The Effect of Differential Weighting of Academics, Experiences, and Competencies Measured by Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) on Race and Ethnicity of Cohorts Accepted to One Medical School.多迷你面试(MMI)所衡量的学术、经历和能力的差异加权对一所医学院录取学生群体的种族和民族的影响。
Acad Med. 2015 Dec;90(12):1651-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000960.

引用本文的文献

1
Grade Disparities Associated with Student Demographics in Upper-Division Biology Courses Across Multiple Institutions.多所院校生物专业高年级课程学生人口统计学特征与成绩差异
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2025 Sep 1;24(3):ar36. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-02-0075.
2
Spoilt for Choice in Undergraduate Medical Admission: Selection of Confident and Considerate Students Using Professional Prequalification and Situational Judgement Test.本科医学招生选择众多:通过专业预资格审查和情境判断测试选拔自信且体贴的学生
Perspect Med Educ. 2025 Jun 23;14(1):360-370. doi: 10.5334/pme.1571. eCollection 2025.
3
Advancing health professions education: a review of holistic admissions and competency-based admissions practices.
推进健康职业教育:对整体招生和基于能力的招生实践的综述。
Med Educ Online. 2025 Dec;30(1):2486979. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2025.2486979. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
4
Developing institution-specific admission competency criteria for prospective health sciences students.为未来的健康科学专业学生制定特定院校的入学能力标准。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1474. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06495-8.
5
Mentoring for Admission and Retention of Black Socio-Ethnic Minorities in Medicine: A Scoping Review.医学领域中针对黑人社会少数族裔的招生与留用指导:一项范围综述
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024 Sep 28;11:23821205241283805. doi: 10.1177/23821205241283805. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
6
Analysis of the current status of interview evaluations in Korean medical schools and professors' perceptions of the interview evaluations process.分析韩国医学院校面试评估的现状及教授对面试评估过程的看法。
Korean J Med Educ. 2024 Sep;36(3):275-285. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2024.302. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
7
The impact of the medical school admissions interview: a systematic review.医学院校招生面试的影响:系统评价。
Can Med Educ J. 2024 Feb 29;15(1):68-74. doi: 10.36834/cmej.76138. eCollection 2024 Feb.
8
Beyond Grade Point Averages and Medical College Admission Test Scores: A Thematic Analysis of Exceptional Performing Medical Student Applications.超越平均绩点和医学院入学考试成绩:对优秀医学生申请材料的主题分析
MedEdPublish (2016). 2021 Jun 2;10:151. doi: 10.15694/mep.2021.000151.1. eCollection 2021.
9
Multiple Mini Interview Performance and Career Maturity related to Medicine.与医学相关的多重迷你面试表现及职业成熟度
MedEdPublish (2016). 2018 Dec 13;7:284. doi: 10.15694/mep.2018.0000284.1. eCollection 2018.
10
Medical Student Interpretation of Visual Art: Who's Got Empathy?医学生对视觉艺术的解读:谁有同理心?
MedEdPublish (2016). 2018 Oct 17;7:206. doi: 10.15694/mep.2018.0000206.2. eCollection 2018.