• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学院校招生面试的影响:系统评价。

The impact of the medical school admissions interview: a systematic review.

机构信息

Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, USA.

School of Engineering, Brown University, Rhode Island, USA.

出版信息

Can Med Educ J. 2024 Feb 29;15(1):68-74. doi: 10.36834/cmej.76138. eCollection 2024 Feb.

DOI:10.36834/cmej.76138
PMID:38528892
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10961126/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Interviews are considered an important part of the medical school admissions process but have been critiqued based on bias and reliability concerns since the 1950s. To determine the impact of the interview, this systematic review investigated the characteristics and outcomes of medical students admitted with and without interviews.

METHODS

We searched four literature databases from inception through August 2022; all studies comparing medical students admitted with and without interviews were included. We excluded studies from outside the medical school setting and non-research reports. We reviewed interview type, study design, quality, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Eight studies from five institutions across five countries were included. Six reported no demographic differences between students admitted with and without interviews; one found that more men were admitted without than with semi-structured interviews, and both cohorts had similar academic and clinical performance. Structured interviews admitted students who scored higher on clinical exams and social competence and lower on academic exams. Cohorts admitted with and without structured interviews had similar mental health issues by their final year of medical school.

DISCUSSION

This review suggests that students admitted with and without unstructured and semi-structured interviews were similar demographically, academically, and clinically. Moreover, structured interviews selected more socially competent students who performed better clinically but worse academically. Further research is needed to determine the impact of the selection interview in medical school admissions.

摘要

背景

自 20 世纪 50 年代以来,面试一直被认为是医学院录取过程的重要组成部分,但由于存在偏见和可靠性问题,面试受到了批评。为了确定面试的影响,本系统评价研究了有面试和无面试的医学生的特征和结果。

方法

我们从创建到 2022 年 8 月在四个文献数据库中进行了搜索;所有比较有面试和无面试的医学生的研究都包括在内。我们排除了来自医学院以外的环境和非研究报告的研究。我们回顾了面试类型、研究设计、质量和结果。

结果

来自五个国家的五所机构的八项研究被纳入。六项研究报告称,有面试和无面试的学生在人口统计学方面没有差异;一项研究发现,在没有半结构化面试的情况下,更多的男性被录取,而这两个队列的学术和临床表现相似。结构化面试录取了在临床考试和社会能力方面得分较高、在学术考试方面得分较低的学生。在医学院的最后一年,有面试和无面试的学生的心理健康问题相似。

讨论

本综述表明,有面试和无面试的学生在人口统计学、学术和临床方面相似。此外,结构化面试选择了更多社会能力更强的学生,他们在临床方面表现更好,但在学术方面表现更差。需要进一步研究来确定面试在医学院招生中的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ab2/10961126/9d5f89a98a41/CMEJ-15-068-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ab2/10961126/9d5f89a98a41/CMEJ-15-068-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ab2/10961126/9d5f89a98a41/CMEJ-15-068-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of the medical school admissions interview: a systematic review.医学院校招生面试的影响:系统评价。
Can Med Educ J. 2024 Feb 29;15(1):68-74. doi: 10.36834/cmej.76138. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Education support services for improving school engagement and academic performance of children and adolescents with a chronic health condition.改善患有慢性病的儿童和青少年的学校参与度和学业成绩的教育支持服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 8;2(2):CD011538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011538.pub2.
3
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
4
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
9
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
10
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of the current status of interview evaluations in Korean medical schools and professors' perceptions of the interview evaluations process.分析韩国医学院校面试评估的现状及教授对面试评估过程的看法。
Korean J Med Educ. 2024 Sep;36(3):275-285. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2024.302. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
2
The medical school curriculum is not designed for long-term retention: we should stop being alarmed when our learners forget.医学院的课程并非为长期记忆而设计:当我们的学习者遗忘时,我们不应再感到惊慌。
Can Med Educ J. 2024 Feb 29;15(1):1-5. doi: 10.36834/cmej.79004. eCollection 2024 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Best practices for interviewing applicants for medical school admissions: a systematic review.医学专业招生面试申请人的最佳实践:系统评价。
Perspect Med Educ. 2022 Oct;11(5):239-246. doi: 10.1007/s40037-022-00726-8. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
2
How Do Programs Measure Resident Performance? A Multi-Institutional Inventory of General Surgery Assessments.程序如何衡量住院医师的表现?一项普通外科评估的多机构清单。
J Surg Educ. 2021 Nov-Dec;78(6):e189-e195. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.08.024. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
3
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
4
Do Interviews Influence Admission Decisions? An Empirical Analysis From an Institution.访谈会影响录取决策吗?来自一个机构的实证分析。
Mil Med. 2021 Feb 26;186(3-4):426-436. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usaa477.
5
US Medical School Applicant Experiences of Bias on the Interview Trail.美国医学院申请人面试经历中的偏见
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2020;31(1):185-200. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2020.0017.
6
The outcomes that an interview-based medical school admission process has on academic performance, psychological health, personality traits, and emotional intelligence.基于面试的医学院录取过程对学业成绩、心理健康、人格特质和情商的影响。
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2018 Oct 15;13(6):503-511. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2018.09.003. eCollection 2018 Dec.
7
Optimizing literature search in systematic reviews - are MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders?优化系统评价中的文献检索——MEDLINE、EMBASE和CENTRAL足以识别肌肉骨骼疾病领域的效应研究吗?
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Nov 22;16(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0264-6.
8
Educational interventions to train healthcare professionals in end-of-life communication: a systematic review and meta-analysis.针对临终沟通对医疗保健专业人员进行培训的教育干预措施:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Apr 29;16:131. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0653-x.
9
Evidence regarding the utility of multiple mini-interview (MMI) for selection to undergraduate health programs: A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 37.关于多重迷你面试(MMI)在本科健康项目选拔中的效用的证据:BEME系统评价:BEME指南第37号
Med Teach. 2016 May;38(5):443-55. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1158799. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
10
Appraising the quality of medical education research methods: the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale-Education.评估医学教育研究方法的质量:医学教育研究质量工具和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表-教育版
Acad Med. 2015 Aug;90(8):1067-76. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000786.