Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Biomech. 2013 Apr 26;46(7):1392-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.02.018. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
Training and testing of balance have potential applications in sports and medicine. Laboratory grade force plates (FP) are considered the gold standard for the measurement of balance performance. Measurements in these systems are based on the parameterization of center of pressure (CoP) trajectories. Previous research validated the inexpensive, widely available and portable Nintendo Wii Balance Board (WBB). The novelty of the present study is that FP and WBB are compared on CoP data that was collected simultaneously, by placing the WBB on the FP. Fourteen healthy participants performed ten sequences of single-leg stance tasks with eyes open (EO), eyes closed (EC) and after a sideways hop (HOP). Within trial comparison of the two systems showed small root-mean-square differences for the CoP trajectories in the x and y direction during the three tasks (mean±SD; EO: 0.33±0.10 and 0.31±0.16 mm; EC: 0.58±0.17 and 0.63±0.19 mm; HOP: 0.74±0.34 and 0.74±0.27 mm, respectively). Additionally, during all 420 trials, comparison of FP and WBB revealed very high Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) of the CoP trajectories (x: 0.999±0.002; y: 0.998±0.003). A general overestimation was found on the WBB compared to the FP for 'CoP path velocity' (EO: 5.3±1.9%; EC: 4.0±1.4%; HOP: 4.6±1.6%) and 'mean absolute CoP sway' (EO: 3.5±0.7%; EC: 3.7±0.5%; HOP: 3.6±1.0%). This overestimation was highly consistent over the 140 trials per task (r>0.996). The present findings demonstrate that WBB is sufficiently accurate in quantifying CoP trajectory, and overall amplitude and velocity during single-leg stance balance tasks.
平衡训练和测试在运动和医学领域具有潜在的应用。实验室级别的力板(FP)被认为是测量平衡性能的金标准。这些系统中的测量是基于压力中心(CoP)轨迹的参数化。以前的研究已经验证了价格低廉、广泛可用且便携的任天堂 Wii 平衡板(WBB)的准确性。本研究的新颖之处在于,将 FP 和 WBB 同时收集的 CoP 数据进行比较,即将 WBB 放置在 FP 上。14 名健康参与者进行了 10 组单腿站立任务,睁眼(EO)、闭眼(EC)和侧身跳跃(HOP)。在两个系统的试验内比较中,在三个任务中,CoP 轨迹的 x 和 y 方向的均方根差异较小(平均值±标准差;EO:0.33±0.10 和 0.31±0.16mm;EC:0.58±0.17 和 0.63±0.19mm;HOP:0.74±0.34 和 0.74±0.27mm)。此外,在所有 420 次试验中,FP 和 WBB 的比较显示 CoP 轨迹的 Pearson 相关系数(r)非常高(x:0.999±0.002;y:0.998±0.003)。与 FP 相比,WBB 发现“CoP 路径速度”(EO:5.3±1.9%;EC:4.0±1.4%;HOP:4.6±1.6%)和“平均绝对 CoP 摆动”(EO:3.5±0.7%;EC:3.7±0.5%;HOP:3.6±1.0%)存在普遍高估。这种高估在每个任务的 140 次试验中高度一致(r>0.996)。本研究结果表明,WBB 在定量单腿站立平衡任务中的 CoP 轨迹、整体幅度和速度方面具有足够的准确性。