Suppr超能文献

是否到了对胎儿非整倍体的游离 DNA 检测出现假阳性发出警报的时候了?

Is it time to sound an alarm about false-positive cell-free DNA testing for fetal aneuploidy?

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA; Prenatal Cytogenetic Laboratory, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;209(5):415-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.03.027. Epub 2013 Mar 22.

Abstract

Testing cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in maternal blood samples has been shown to have very high sensitivity for the detection of fetal aneuploidy with very low false-positive results in high-risk patients who undergo invasive prenatal diagnosis. Recent observation in clinical practice of several cases of positive cfDNA tests for trisomy 18 and trisomy 13, which were not confirmed by cytogenetic testing of the pregnancy, may reflect a limitation of the positive predictive value of this quantitative testing, particularly when it is used to detect rare aneuploidies. Analysis of a larger number of false-positive cases is needed to evaluate whether these observations reflect the positive predictive value that should be expected. Infrequently, mechanisms (such as low percentage mosaicism or confined placental mosaicism) might also lead to positive cfDNA testing that is not concordant with standard prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis. The need to explore these and other possible causes of false-positive cfDNA testing is exemplified by 2 of these cases. Additional evaluation of cfDNA testing in clinical practice and a mechanism for the systematic reporting of false-positive and false-negative cases will be important before this test is offered widely to the general population of low-risk obstetric patients. In the meantime, incorporating information about the positive predictive value in pretest counseling and in clinical laboratory reports is recommended. These experiences reinforce the importance of offering invasive testing to confirm cfDNA results before parental decision-making.

摘要

检测母体血液中的游离胎儿 DNA(cfDNA)已被证明对高风险患者的胎儿非整倍体检测具有非常高的灵敏度,且假阳性结果率非常低,这些患者接受了侵入性产前诊断。最近在临床实践中观察到几例 cfDNA 检测为 18 三体和 13 三体阳性的病例,但妊娠的细胞遗传学检测并未证实,这可能反映了这种定量检测的阳性预测值存在局限性,尤其是在检测罕见非整倍体时。需要分析更多的假阳性病例,以评估这些观察结果是否反映了预期的阳性预测值。偶尔,一些机制(如低百分比嵌合体或局限胎盘嵌合体)也可能导致 cfDNA 检测与标准产前细胞遗传学诊断不一致。这两个病例说明了需要探索 cfDNA 检测假阳性的其他可能原因。在将该检测广泛应用于低危产科患者人群之前,需要对 cfDNA 检测在临床实践中的应用进行额外评估,并建立假阳性和假阴性病例的系统报告机制。在此期间,建议在检测前咨询和临床实验室报告中纳入阳性预测值的信息。这些经验强调了在做出父母决策之前,提供侵入性检测来确认 cfDNA 结果的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验