Elanchenny Meena, Moss Arthur J, McNitt Scott, Aktas Mehmet, Polonsky Slava, Zareba Wojciech, Goldenberg Ilan
Cardiology Unit of the Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2013 Mar;18(2):140-8. doi: 10.1111/anec.12006. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
There are limited data regarding racial differences in response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D).
We assessed the effectiveness of CRT-D, as compared to implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy alone, in reducing the risk of heart failure (HF) or death and changes in cardiac volumes among 1638 (90%) white patients and 143 (8%) black patients enrolled in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT).
Enrolled black patients displayed a higher frequency of diabetes mellitus, treated hypertension, higher creatinine levels, and a lower distance walked in the baseline 6-minute walk test. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that at 3 years of follow-up the cumulative probability of HF or death was higher among blacks (29%) as compared with whites (22%; P = 0.05). Both black and white patients experienced similar and pronounced reductions in cardiac volumes with CRT-D therapy (all P values for comparison between the two groups >0.10). Risk reduction conferred by CRT-D therapy as not significantly different between blacks and whites (hazard ratio = 0.78 and 0.60, respectively; P for the difference = 0.44). However, possibly due to sample size limitations the CRT-D versus ICD only adjusted risk for HF/death in blacks was not statistically significant.
Black patients in MADIT-CRT experienced increased risk of HF or death as compared with whites, but displayed a similar magnitude echocardiographic response to CRT-D. These findings suggest that cardiac resynchronization therapy may be an effective therapeutic modality in black patients. However, further studies are needed to assess the clinical response to CRT-D in this high-risk population.
关于心脏再同步化治疗除颤器(CRT-D)反应的种族差异,相关数据有限。
我们评估了CRT-D与单独植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)治疗相比,在降低心力衰竭(HF)或死亡风险以及心脏容积变化方面的效果,这些患者来自多中心自动除颤器植入试验心脏再同步治疗(MADIT-CRT),其中有1638名(90%)白人患者和143名(8%)黑人患者。
入组的黑人患者糖尿病、接受治疗的高血压、肌酐水平较高的发生率更高,且在基线6分钟步行试验中行走距离较短。Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示,在3年随访时,黑人发生HF或死亡的累积概率(29%)高于白人(22%;P = 0.05)。CRT-D治疗使黑人和白人患者的心脏容积均出现相似且显著的减小(两组间比较的所有P值>0.10)。CRT-D治疗带来的风险降低在黑人和白人之间无显著差异(风险比分别为0.78和0.60;差异的P值 = 0.44)。然而,可能由于样本量限制,CRT-D与ICD相比仅对黑人HF/死亡调整后的风险在统计学上无显著意义。
与白人相比,MADIT-CRT中的黑人患者发生HF或死亡的风险增加,但对CRT-D的超声心动图反应幅度相似。这些发现表明心脏再同步化治疗可能是黑人患者的一种有效治疗方式。然而,需要进一步研究来评估这一高危人群对CRT-D的临床反应。