Mitchell Judith E, Hellkamp Anne S, Mark Daniel B, Anderson Jill, Poole Jeanne E, Lee Kerry L, Bardy Gust H
State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA.
Am Heart J. 2008 Mar;155(3):501-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.10.022. Epub 2007 Dec 19.
The SCD-HeFT demonstrated that implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) therapy significantly improved survival compared to medical therapy alone in stable moderately symptomatic heart failure patients with an ejection fraction < or = 35%. The purpose of this report is to describe the outcomes in African Americans (AAs) and other minorities.
Of 2521 patients enrolled, 23% were minorities and 17% were AAs. Baseline demographic, clinical variables, socioeconomic status, and long-term outcomes were compared according to race. Two major prespecified subgroups were examined: heart failure cause (ischemic vs nonischemic) and New York Heart Association class (II vs III).
At baseline, compared to whites, AAs were younger and had more nonischemic heart failure, lower ejection fractions, worse New York Heart Association functional class, and higher prevalence of a history of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. Comparable percentages of whites and AAs held paid jobs, but whites had a significantly higher educational level and household income (P = .001). Compliance with ICD implantation and medical therapy was comparable in both subgroups. No significant difference was observed in the rate of ICD discharge among whites and AAs. Adjusted mortality risk was significantly higher in AAs compared to whites (hazard ratio 1.27, P = .038). Mortality was equally reduced in both race groups receiving ICD therapy compared to placebo (hazard ratio 0.65 in AAs and 0.73 in whites).
Survival benefits from ICD therapy in SCD-HeFT were not dependent on race. In addition, in this clinical trial setting, there was no evidence that AAs were less willing to accept ICD therapy than whites.
“心力衰竭猝死试验(SCD-HeFT)”表明,对于射血分数≤35%的稳定的中度症状性心力衰竭患者,与单纯药物治疗相比,植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)治疗显著提高了生存率。本报告的目的是描述非裔美国人(AA)和其他少数族裔的治疗结果。
在登记入组的2521例患者中,23%为少数族裔,17%为非裔美国人。根据种族对基线人口统计学、临床变量、社会经济状况和长期治疗结果进行比较。研究了两个主要的预设亚组:心力衰竭病因(缺血性与非缺血性)和纽约心脏协会心功能分级(Ⅱ级与Ⅲ级)。
在基线时,与白人相比,非裔美国人更年轻,非缺血性心力衰竭更多,射血分数更低,纽约心脏协会心功能分级更差,非持续性室性心动过速病史的患病率更高。有带薪工作的白人和非裔美国人的比例相当,但白人的教育水平和家庭收入显著更高(P = 0.001)。两个亚组中ICD植入和药物治疗的依从性相当。白人和非裔美国人的ICD放电率没有显著差异。与白人相比,非裔美国人的校正死亡风险显著更高(风险比1.27,P = 0.038)。与安慰剂相比,接受ICD治疗的两个种族组的死亡率均同样降低(非裔美国人为风险比0.65,白人为0.73)。
“心力衰竭猝死试验(SCD-HeFT)”中ICD治疗的生存获益不依赖于种族。此外,在本临床试验环境中,没有证据表明非裔美国人比白人更不愿意接受ICD治疗。