Brooks Christine, Vickers Amy Manning, Aryal Subhash
Texas Health Presbyterian Dallas Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Dallas, TX 75231, USA.
Adv Neonatal Care. 2013 Apr;13(2):131-8. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0b013e31827e225b.
The objective of this study was to compare the differences in lipid loss from 24 samples of banked donor human milk (DHM) among 3 feeding methods: DHM given by syringe pump over 1 hour, 2 hours, and by bolus/gravity gavage.
Comparative, descriptive. There were no human subjects.
Twenty-four samples of 8 oz of DHM were divided into four 60-mL aliquots. Timed feedings were given by Medfusion 2001 syringe pumps with syringes connected to narrow-lumened extension sets designed for enteral feedings and connected to standard silastic enteral feeding tubes. Gravity feedings were given using the identical syringes connected to the same silastic feeding tubes. All aliquots were analyzed with the York Dairy Analyzer. Univariate repeated-measures analyses of variance were used for the omnibus testing for overall differences between the feeding methods. Lipid content expressed as grams per deciliter at the end of each feeding method was compared with the prefed control samples using the Dunnett's test. The Tukey correction was used for other pairwise multiple comparisons.
The univariate repeated-measures analysis of variance conducted to test for overall differences between feeding methods showed a significant difference between the methods (F = 58.57, df = 3, 69, P < .0001). Post hoc analysis using the Dunnett's approach revealed that there was a significant difference in fat content between the control sample and the 1-hour and 2-hours feeding methods (P < .0001), but we did not find any significant difference in fat content between the control and the gravity feeding methods (P = .3296). Pairwise comparison using the Tukey correction revealed a significant difference between both gravity and 1-hour feeding methods (P < .0001), and gravity and 2-hour feeding method (P < .0001). There was no significant difference in lipid content between the 1-hour and 2-hour feeding methods (P = .2729).
Unlike gravity feedings, the timed feedings resulted in a statistically significant loss of fat as compared with their controls. These findings should raise questions about how those infants in the neonatal intensive care unit are routinely gavage fed.
本研究的目的是比较3种喂养方式下24份保存的捐赠人乳(DHM)样本的脂质损失差异,这3种喂养方式分别为:通过注射泵在1小时内输注DHM、在2小时内输注DHM以及推注/重力管饲。
比较性、描述性研究。无人体受试者。
将24份8盎司的DHM样本分成4个60毫升的等分试样。通过Medfusion 2001注射泵进行定时喂养,注射器连接到专为肠内喂养设计的窄腔延长装置,并连接到标准硅胶肠内喂养管。重力喂养使用连接到相同硅胶喂养管的相同注射器进行。所有等分试样均使用约克乳品分析仪进行分析。单变量重复测量方差分析用于对喂养方式之间的总体差异进行综合检验。使用邓尼特检验将每种喂养方式结束时以克每分升表示的脂质含量与喂养前的对照样本进行比较。使用图基校正进行其他两两多重比较。
为检验喂养方式之间的总体差异而进行的单变量重复测量方差分析显示,各方式之间存在显著差异(F = 58.57,自由度 = 3, 69,P < .0001)。使用邓尼特方法进行的事后分析表明,对照样本与1小时和2小时喂养方式之间的脂肪含量存在显著差异(P < .0001),但我们未发现对照与重力喂养方式之间的脂肪含量有任何显著差异(P = .3296)。使用图基校正进行的两两比较显示,重力喂养与1小时喂养方式之间存在显著差异(P < .0001),重力喂养与2小时喂养方式之间也存在显著差异(P < .0001)。1小时和2小时喂养方式之间的脂质含量无显著差异(P = .2729)。
与重力喂养不同,定时喂养与对照相比导致脂肪有统计学意义的损失。这些发现应引发关于新生儿重症监护病房中那些婴儿常规管饲喂养方式的疑问。