Zhao Bao-Sheng, Liu Shang-Guo, Wang Tian-Yun, Ji Ying-Hua, Qi Bo, Tao Yi-Peng, Li Han-Chen, Wu Xiang-Nan
Department of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui, China.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(1):139-43. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.1.139.
Patients at the same pathological stage of esophageal cancer (EC) that received the same surgical therapy by the same surgeon may have distinct prognoses. The current study aimed to explore the possibility of differentially- expressed microRNAs (miRNAs) underlying this phenomenon. Samples were collected from EC patients at the same tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage but with different prognoses. Paracancerous normal tissues were taken as controls. The specimens were histopathologically analyzed. Differentially-expressed miRNAs were analyzed using real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Compared with patients with poor prognosis, those with good prognosis exhibited 88 two-fold or more than two-fold increased miRNA fragments and 4 half-decreased miRNAs. The most noticeably up-regulated miRNAs included hsa-miR-31, hsa-miR- 196b, hsa-miR-652, hsa-miR-125a-5p, hsa-miR-146b, hsa-miR-200c, hsa-miR-23b, hsa-miR-29a, hsa-miR-186, hsa-miR-205, hsa-miR-376a, hsa-miR-410, hsa-miR-532-3p, and hsa-miR-598, whereas the most significantly- downregulated miRNAs were hsa-let-7e, hsa-miR-130b, and hsa-miR-103. EC patients at same TNM stage but with different prognoses show differentially-expressed miRNAs.
处于相同病理阶段的食管癌(EC)患者,若由同一位外科医生进行相同的手术治疗,其预后可能不同。本研究旨在探讨导致这种现象的差异表达微小RNA(miRNA)的可能性。样本取自处于相同肿瘤淋巴结转移(TNM)阶段但预后不同的EC患者。癌旁正常组织作为对照。对标本进行组织病理学分析。使用实时定量逆转录聚合酶链反应分析差异表达的miRNA。与预后不良的患者相比,预后良好的患者表现出88种miRNA片段增加两倍或两倍以上,以及4种miRNA减半。上调最明显的miRNA包括hsa-miR-31、hsa-miR-196b、hsa-miR-652、hsa-miR-125a-5p、hsa-miR-146b、hsa-miR-200c、hsa-miR-23b、hsa-miR-29a、hsa-miR-186、hsa-miR-205、hsa-miR-376a、hsa-miR-410、hsa-miR-532-3p和hsa-miR-598,而下调最显著的miRNA是hsa-let-7e、hsa-miR-130b和hsa-miR-103。处于相同TNM阶段但预后不同的EC患者表现出差异表达的miRNA。