Suppr超能文献

与 MRI 相比,普通 X 光片低估了膝关节后髁间窝偏移的不对称性。

Plain radiographs underestimate the asymmetry of the posterior condylar offset of the knee compared with MRI.

机构信息

University of Pennsylvania, 1 Cupp Pavilion, 39th and Market Streets, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jan;472(1):155-61. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2946-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Restoration of posterior condylar offset (PCO) during total knee arthroplasty is essential to maximize range of motion, prevent impingement, and minimize flexion instability. Previously, PCO was determined with lateral radiographs, which could not distinguish the asymmetries between the femoral condyles. MRI can independently measure both medial and lateral PCO.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study is to determine the normal PCO of the knee, to establish the differences in medial and lateral PCO, and to compare PCO measurements obtained from radiographs versus those obtained from MRI.

METHODS

We identified 32 patients without a history of prior knee pathology who had both plain radiographs and MRI scans of the same knee performed. The PCO was measured on lateral radiographs and compared with MRI measurements using a novel three-dimensional protocol.

RESULTS

By MRI, the mean medial PCO was 29 (± 3) mm and the mean lateral PCO was 26 (± 3) mm; both values were greater (p < 0.001 and p = 0.03, respectively) than the mean radiographic PCO of 25 (± 2) mm. The medial PCO, as measured by MRI, was significantly greater than the lateral PCO (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Plain radiographs underestimate PCO as well as the asymmetry of the medial and lateral PCO compared with MRI. This discrepancy is the result of both articular cartilage thickness and the anatomic differences between medial and lateral condyles. Designers of knee prostheses and instrumentation should take these differences into account.

摘要

背景

在全膝关节置换术中,恢复后髁偏心距(PCO)对于最大限度地增加活动范围、防止撞击和最小化屈曲不稳定性至关重要。此前,PCO 是通过侧位 X 线片确定的,而该方法无法区分股骨髁之间的不对称性。MRI 可以独立测量内侧和外侧 PCO。

问题/目的:本研究旨在确定膝关节的正常 PCO,确定内侧和外侧 PCO 的差异,并比较 X 线片和 MRI 测量的 PCO 值。

方法

我们确定了 32 例无膝关节病史的患者,这些患者的同一条膝关节同时进行了普通 X 线片和 MRI 扫描。在侧位 X 线片上测量 PCO,并使用新的三维方案与 MRI 测量值进行比较。

结果

MRI 测量的平均内侧 PCO 为 29(±3)mm,平均外侧 PCO 为 26(±3)mm;与 X 线片测量的平均 PCO(25(±2)mm)相比,这两个值均更大(p<0.001 和 p=0.03)。MRI 测量的内侧 PCO 明显大于外侧 PCO(p<0.001)。

结论

与 MRI 相比,普通 X 线片低估了 PCO 以及内侧和外侧 PCO 的不对称性。这种差异是由于关节软骨厚度和内侧与外侧髁之间的解剖差异造成的。膝关节假体和器械的设计者应考虑到这些差异。

相似文献

3
Reliability of the posterior condylar offset.髁后间距的可靠性。
J Orthop Res. 2022 Aug;40(8):1794-1800. doi: 10.1002/jor.25205. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
4
No sex differences exist in posterior condylar offsets of the knee.膝关节后髁偏移不存在性别差异。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1425-31. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4066-z. Epub 2014 Dec 2.

引用本文的文献

9
Gender differences in morphology exist in posterior condylar offsets of the knee in Korean population.韩国人群中,膝关节后髁偏心距存在性别差异。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 May;27(5):1628-1634. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5259-x. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
10
No sex differences exist in posterior condylar offsets of the knee.膝关节后髁偏移不存在性别差异。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1425-31. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4066-z. Epub 2014 Dec 2.

本文引用的文献

3
Advanced MRI of articular cartilage.关节软骨的高级磁共振成像
Imaging Med. 2011 Oct;3(5):541-555. doi: 10.2217/iim.11.43.
9
The effect of femoral component malrotation on patellar biomechanics.股骨部件旋转不良对髌股生物力学的影响。
J Biomech. 2008 Dec 5;41(16):3332-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.09.032. Epub 2008 Nov 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验