Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Jun;51(6):1924-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00427-13. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
We evaluated three commercial colistin susceptibility testing methods using 213 bloodstream Acinetobacter isolates identified by gene sequencing. Compared to the agar dilution reference method, excellent categorical agreements (both 99.1%) were observed using Vitek 2 and Etest, compared to 87.3% (95.7% for Acinetobacter baumannii and 80.7% for non-baumannii Acinetobacter isolates) using MicroScan.
我们使用基因测序鉴定的 213 株血流感染不动杆菌分离株评估了三种商业的多粘菌素药敏检测方法。与琼脂稀释法参考方法相比,Vitek 2 和 Etest 的分类符合率均非常高(均为 99.1%),而 MicroScan 的分类符合率为 87.3%(鲍曼不动杆菌为 95.7%,非鲍曼不动杆菌为 80.7%)。