School of Public Policy and Governance, University of Toronto, Toronto, CANADA.
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2013 Mar 27;2(1):10. doi: 10.1186/2045-4015-2-10.
The regulation of medical practice can historically be understood as a second-level agency relationship whereby the state delegated authority to professional bodies to police the primary agency relationship between the individual physician and the patient. Borow, Levi and Glekin show how different national systems vary in the degree to which they insist on institutionally insulating the agency function from the promotion of private professional interests, and relate these variations to different models of the health care state. In fact these differences have even deeper roots in different "liberal" or "coordinated" varieties of capitalist political economies. Neither model is inherently more efficient than the other: what matters is the internal coherence or logic of these systems that conditions the expectations of actors in responding to particular challenges. The territory that Borow, Levi and Glekin have usefully mapped invites further exploration in this regard.This is a commentary on http://www.ijhpr.org/content/2/1/8.
医学实践的规范可以从历史上被理解为一种二级代理关系,在此关系中,国家将权力委托给专业机构,以监管个体医生和患者之间的主要代理关系。Borow、Levi 和 Glekin 展示了不同的国家系统在多大程度上坚持将代理职能与促进私人专业利益隔离开来,并将这些差异与医疗保健国家的不同模式联系起来。事实上,这些差异在不同的“自由”或“协调”的资本主义政治经济模式中有着更深的根源。这两种模式都不比另一种模式内在地更有效率:重要的是这些系统的内在一致性或逻辑,这决定了参与者在应对特定挑战时的期望。Borow、Levi 和 Glekin 所绘制的领域在这方面值得进一步探讨。这是对 http://www.ijhpr.org/content/2/1/8 的评论。