Gold Coast Campus, School of Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Locked Mail Bag 4, Coolangatta, QLD 4225, AUSTRALIA.
BMC Nurs. 2013 Mar 27;12:9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-12-9.
This paper presents a discussion related to the recent decision in Australia to introduce mandatory Continuing Professional Development (CPD) for nurses. Historically there has been international debate surrounding mandatory CPD requirements; this debate is ongoing as Australian nurses face a diverse range of CPD offerings from a variety of providers.
The purpose of this paper is to examine how mandatory CPD requirements for national nursing registration in Australia have evolved and to present an analysis of what this will mean for Australian nurses. What is yet to be determined is how to measure professional development and the effectiveness of professional development education. This is important to the international community with consensus in the literature that professional development is linked to ongoing education. Contradicting arguments are presented about whether this professional development should be mandatory.
Presenting a contemporary discussion about the current and potential impact of mandatory CPD requirements for nurses, this discussion paper utilises the case of Australia's current national policy and CPD operation to examine the choices that nurses make in order to fulfil their legislative requirements. Additional arguments are presented about the barriers nurses face in undertaking CPD. The quest for effective CPD is complex and should incorporate different situations for nurses and individual learning styles.
本文讨论了澳大利亚最近决定对护士实行强制性持续专业发展(CPD)的问题。从历史上看,国际上一直围绕强制性 CPD 要求展开辩论;随着澳大利亚护士面临着各种不同的 CPD 课程和各种不同的提供者,这一辩论仍在继续。
本文旨在探讨澳大利亚国家护士注册的强制性 CPD 要求是如何演变的,并对这对澳大利亚护士意味着什么进行分析。目前还没有确定的是如何衡量专业发展和专业发展教育的效果。这对国际社会来说很重要,因为文献中有共识认为专业发展与持续教育有关。关于这种专业发展是否应该是强制性的,存在相互矛盾的观点。
本文对当前和潜在的强制性 CPD 要求对护士的影响进行了当代讨论,利用澳大利亚当前的国家政策和 CPD 运作案例,探讨了护士为满足立法要求而做出的选择。本文还提出了关于护士在进行 CPD 时面临的障碍的额外论点。对有效 CPD 的追求是复杂的,应该结合护士的不同情况和个人学习风格。