Department of Ophthalmology of Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, and Tongji Eye Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, PR China.
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2013 May;41(5):426-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.12.012. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
Linezolid is the first available oxazolidinone, possessing broad-spectrum activity against Gram-positive bacteria and a favourable pharmacokinetic profile. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of linezolid with vancomycin, the gold-standard treatment, for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-related infections. A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) identified in PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Embase was performed. Nine RCTs, involving 5249 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The results indicated that linezolid was associated with superior efficacy compared with vancomycin for MRSA-related infection in terms of clinical treatment success [8 RCTs, 2174 patients, odds ratio (OR) = 1.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22-2.56] and microbiological treatment success (9 RCTs, 1555 patients, OR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.22-2.58). Although no difference was found regarding the overall incidence of drug-related adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) between the linezolid and vancomycin therapy groups (drug-related AEs, 8 RCTs, 5034 patients, OR = 1.20, 95% CI 0.98-1.48; SAEs, 5 RCTs, 2072 patients, OR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.74-1.36), the linezolid therapy group was associated with significantly fewer patients experiencing abnormal renal function (reduced by ca. 60% compared with the vancomycin therapy group; 4 RCTs, 2531 patients, OR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.28-0.55), which is a well-recognised limitation of vancomycin. This meta-analysis provides evidence that linezolid possesses significant advantages compared with vancomycin and may be a superior alternative for MRSA-related infection.
利奈唑胺是第一种可供使用的恶唑烷酮类药物,对革兰氏阳性菌具有广谱活性和良好的药代动力学特性。本研究旨在比较利奈唑胺与万古霉素(金标准治疗药物)治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)相关感染的疗效和安全性。通过对 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆和 Embase 中检索到的随机对照试验(RCT)进行荟萃分析。该荟萃分析纳入了 9 项 RCT,共涉及 5249 例患者。结果表明,与万古霉素相比,利奈唑胺治疗 MRSA 相关感染的临床治疗成功率(8 项 RCT,2174 例患者,优势比[OR] = 1.77,95%置信区间[CI] 1.22-2.56)和微生物学治疗成功率(9 项 RCT,1555 例患者,OR = 1.78,95% CI 1.22-2.58)更高。虽然利奈唑胺组和万古霉素组的药物相关不良事件(AE)和严重 AE(SAE)总发生率无差异(药物相关 AE,8 项 RCT,5034 例患者,OR = 1.20,95% CI 0.98-1.48;SAE,5 项 RCT,2072 例患者,OR = 1.00,95% CI 0.74-1.36),但利奈唑胺组出现肾功能异常的患者明显更少(减少约 60%;4 项 RCT,2531 例患者,OR = 0.39,95% CI 0.28-0.55),这是万古霉素公认的局限性。这项荟萃分析表明,与万古霉素相比,利奈唑胺具有显著优势,可能是治疗 MRSA 相关感染的更好选择。