Sany Dawlat, Elshahawy Yasser, Anwar Walid
Nephrology Division, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2013 Mar;24(2):260-73.
The significance of glycated albumin (GA) compared with casual plasma glucose (PG) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was evaluated as an indicator of the glycemic control state in hemodialysis (HD) patients with diabetes. In HD patients with diabetes (n = 25), the mean PG, GA and HbA1c levels were 192.9 + 23 mg/dL, 278.8 + 43 μmol/L and 5.9 + 0.5%, respectively, which were higher by 43.9%, 67.04% and 18%, respectively, compared with HD patients without diabetes (n = 25). HbA1c levels were significantly lower than simultaneous PG and GA values in those patients in comparison with the three parameters in patients who had diabetes without renal dysfunction (n = 25). A significant negative correlation was found between GA and serum albumin (r = 0.21, P <0.05) in HD patients with diabetes, whereas HbA1c correlated positively and negatively with hemoglobin (r = 0.11, P <0.01) and weekly dose of erythropoietin injection (r = -0.19, P < 0.01), respectively. Although PG and GA did not differ significantly between HD patients with diabetes and with and without erythropoietin injection, HbA1c levels were significantly higher in patients without erythropoietin. Categorization of glycemic control into arbitrary quartiles by GA level led to better glycemic control in a significantly higher proportion of HD patients with diabetes than those assessed by HA1c. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that hemoglobin in addition to PG emerged as an independent factor associated with HbA1c in HD patients with diabetes, while PG, body mass index and albumin were an independent factor associated with GA.
it is suggested that GA provides a significantly better measure to estimate glycemic control in HD patients with diabetes and that the assessment of glycemic control by HbA1c in these patients might lead to likely underestimation as a result of the increasing proportion of young erythrocyte by the use of erythropoietin.
评估糖化白蛋白(GA)与随机血糖(PG)和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)相比,作为糖尿病血液透析(HD)患者血糖控制状态指标的意义。在糖尿病HD患者(n = 25)中,平均PG、GA和HbA1c水平分别为192.9 + 23mg/dL、278.8 + 43μmol/L和5.9 + 0.5%,与无糖尿病的HD患者(n = 25)相比,分别高出43.9%、67.04%和18%。与无肾功能不全的糖尿病患者(n = 25)的三个参数相比,这些患者的HbA1c水平显著低于同时期的PG和GA值。糖尿病HD患者中,GA与血清白蛋白之间存在显著负相关(r = 0.21,P <0.05),而HbA1c分别与血红蛋白呈正相关(r = 0.11,P <0.01)和与促红细胞生成素注射的每周剂量呈负相关(r = -0.19,P <0.01)。虽然糖尿病HD患者中,使用和未使用促红细胞生成素的患者PG和GA无显著差异,但未使用促红细胞生成素的患者HbA1c水平显著更高。根据GA水平将血糖控制分类为任意四分位数,与根据HbA1c评估相比,在显著更高比例的糖尿病HD患者中实现了更好的血糖控制。多元回归分析表明,除PG外,血红蛋白是糖尿病HD患者中与HbA1c相关的独立因素,而PG、体重指数和白蛋白是与GA相关的独立因素。
提示GA能更显著地评估糖尿病HD患者的血糖控制情况,且在这些患者中使用HbA1c评估血糖控制可能因使用促红细胞生成素导致年轻红细胞比例增加而被低估。