Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Feb;131(2):205-12. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamaophthalmol.124.
To investigate the perspectives of vision care providers (VCPs) on inquiring about driving among their older adult patients.
We surveyed a stratified random sample of 500 VCPs, 404 of whom completed the survey (response rate, 80.8%), who had been identified using membership lists of the Michigan Optometric Association and the Michigan Society of Eye Physicians and Surgeons. The survey assessed VCPs' attitudes and behaviors in addressing driving concerns with older patients. Ordinal logistic regression analyses were performed to identify associations between provider or practice characteristics and survey responses.
More than 80% of VCPs are confident in their ability to determine whether their patients' vision is adequate for safe driving. The VCPs cite liability risk (for reporting [24.2%] and for not reporting [43.6%]) as a barrier to reporting unsafe drivers. Almost two-thirds report routinely inquiring about their older patients' driving, and 86.3% consider that counseling patients about driving is their responsibility. Almost 60% (57.2%) worry that reporting patients negatively influences the physician-patient relationship, and 43.1% consider that reporting is a breach of physician-patient confidentiality. Attitudes and behaviors in discussing driving varied by VCP characteristics, particularly provider type. More than one-third of VCPs (35.6%) report sometimes, often, or always communicating concerns about patients' driving to their primary care physician. Resources endorsed by VCPs as helpful or very helpful include driving assessment guidelines (80.5%), clinical screening instruments (70.1%), and patient self-assessment tools (59.9%).
While VCPs view that advising patients about driving is an important responsibility, further attention should be given to addressing barriers, providing resources, and devising communication strategies between VCPs and other members of the health care team.
调查视力保健提供者(VCP)对询问其老年患者驾驶能力的看法。
我们对密歇根州验光协会和密歇根州眼科医生和外科医生协会的成员名单进行了分层随机抽样,调查了 500 名 VCP,其中 404 名完成了调查(应答率为 80.8%)。该调查评估了 VCP 在解决老年患者驾驶问题时的态度和行为。采用有序逻辑回归分析确定提供者或实践特征与调查结果之间的关联。
超过 80%的 VCP 对自己判断患者视力是否足以安全驾驶的能力有信心。VCP 将报告的责任风险(报告[24.2%]和未报告[43.6%])列为报告不安全驾驶员的障碍。近三分之二的人报告定期询问他们的老年患者的驾驶情况,86.3%的人认为咨询患者驾驶情况是他们的责任。近 60%(57.2%)的人担心报告患者会对医患关系产生负面影响,而 43.1%的人认为报告是对医患保密的侵犯。讨论驾驶问题的态度和行为因 VCP 特征而异,特别是提供者类型。超过三分之一的 VCP(35.6%)报告有时、经常或总是将患者驾驶问题的担忧传达给他们的初级保健医生。VCP 认为有用或非常有用的资源包括驾驶评估指南(80.5%)、临床筛查工具(70.1%)和患者自我评估工具(59.9%)。
虽然 VCP 认为为患者提供驾驶建议是一项重要责任,但应进一步关注解决障碍、提供资源以及制定 VCP 与医疗保健团队其他成员之间的沟通策略。