Department of Anaesthesiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Anaesthesia. 2013 Jun;68(6):612-20. doi: 10.1111/anae.12182. Epub 2013 Apr 1.
We investigated whether the type of anaesthesia affects mortality and length of stay after non-traumatic major lower extremity amputations. A total of 1365 eligible patients who were operated on between 2002 and 2010 were included in the final analysis. Propensity score matching was used to produce 475 matched pairs of patients undergoing operation with either general or regional anaesthesia. We found that 30-day mortality was significantly greater in the general anaesthesia group compared with the regional anaesthesia group, with an odds ratio (95% CI) of 1.5 (1.0-2.3) in the total matched population and 4.2 (1.3-13.4) in a high-risk subgroup. The median (IQR [range]) length of postoperative hospital stay was significantly less in the patients of the high-risk subgroup who had general anaesthesia at 15 (7-21 [1-101]) days compared with 25 days (10-37 [0-78]) for those who had regional anaesthesia (p = 0.027). The results of our study suggest that 30-day mortality is significantly higher in patients undergoing major lower extremity amputations under general anaesthesia compared with regional anaesthesia.
我们研究了麻醉类型是否会影响非创伤性大下肢截肢术后的死亡率和住院时间。共有 1365 名符合条件的患者在 2002 年至 2010 年间接受了手术,最终分析纳入了这 1365 名患者。采用倾向评分匹配法产生了 475 对接受全身麻醉或区域麻醉手术的匹配患者。我们发现,全身麻醉组的 30 天死亡率明显高于区域麻醉组,总匹配人群的优势比(95%CI)为 1.5(1.0-2.3),高危亚组为 4.2(1.3-13.4)。全身麻醉高危亚组患者的术后住院中位数(IQR[范围])明显短于区域麻醉组,分别为 15(7-21[1-101])天和 25 天(10-37[0-78])(p=0.027)。我们的研究结果表明,与区域麻醉相比,全身麻醉下进行大下肢截肢术的患者 30 天死亡率明显更高。