Kim Na Young, Lee Ki-Young, Bai Sun Joon, Hong Jung Hwa, Lee Jinwoo, Park Jong Min, Kim Shin Hyung
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute Department of Research Affairs, Biostatistics Collaboration Units Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jul;95(29):e4302. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004302.
Diabetic foot ulcer is the most common cause of diabetes-associated nontraumatic lower extremity amputation. Most patients who undergo lower extremity amputation for a diabetic foot have had diabetes for a long time and suffer from multiorgan disorder; thus, it can be a challenge to ensure sufficient anesthetic and analgesic effects while maintaining stable hemodynamics. Recently, peripheral nerve block has gained popularity owing to its attenuating effects of systemic concerns. This retrospective observational study aimed to compare the effects of remifentanil-based general anesthesia (GEA) and popliteal nerve block (PNB) on postoperative pain and hemodynamic stability in diabetic patients undergoing distal foot amputation.A total of 59 consecutive patients with a diabetic foot who underwent distal foot amputation between January 2012 and May 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients received remifentanil-based GEA (GEA group, n = 32) or PNB (PNB group, n = 27). The primary outcomes were to evaluate postoperative analgesic effects and perioperative hemodynamics. Also, postoperative pulmonary complications and 6-month mortality were assessed as secondary outcomes.Significant differences in pain scores using numeric rating scale were observed between the groups in a linear mixed model analysis (PGroup×Time = 0.044). Even after post hoc analysis with the Bonferroni correction, the numeric rating scale scores were significantly lower in the PNB group. Furthermore, patients in the PNB group required less pethidine during the first 6 hours after surgery (27 ± 28 vs 9 ± 18 mg; P = 0.013). The GEA group had a lower mean blood pressure (Bonferroni-corrected P < 0.01), despite receiving more ephedrine (P < 0.001). Significantly more patients in the GEA group suffered from postoperative pneumonia and required the management in intensive care unit (P = 0.030 and 0.038, respectively). However, the groups did not differ in terms of 6-month mortality.This study demonstrated that compared with remifentanil-based GEA, PNB might be a favorable option for diabetic patients undergoing distal foot amputation, despite the lack of significant mortality benefits, as PNB was associated with improved postoperative analgesia, hemodynamic stability, and a low incidence of pulmonary complications during the immediate postoperative period, especially in high-risk patients.
糖尿病足溃疡是糖尿病相关非创伤性下肢截肢最常见的原因。大多数因糖尿病足接受下肢截肢的患者患有糖尿病时间较长且伴有多器官功能障碍;因此,在维持血流动力学稳定的同时确保足够的麻醉和镇痛效果可能具有挑战性。近年来,外周神经阻滞因其减轻全身影响的作用而受到欢迎。本回顾性观察研究旨在比较瑞芬太尼全麻(GEA)和腘窝神经阻滞(PNB)对糖尿病患者足部远端截肢术后疼痛和血流动力学稳定性的影响。
回顾性分析了2012年1月至2014年5月期间连续59例行足部远端截肢术的糖尿病足患者。患者接受瑞芬太尼全麻(GEA组,n = 32)或PNB(PNB组,n = 27)。主要结局是评估术后镇痛效果和围手术期血流动力学。此外,评估术后肺部并发症和6个月死亡率作为次要结局。
线性混合模型分析显示,两组间数字评分量表的疼痛评分存在显著差异(P组×时间 = 0.044)。即使在采用Bonferroni校正进行事后分析后,PNB组的数字评分量表评分仍显著较低。此外,PNB组患者术后前6小时所需哌替啶较少(27±28 vs 9±18mg;P = 0.013)。GEA组平均血压较低(Bonferroni校正P < 0.01),尽管使用了更多麻黄碱(P < 0.001)。GEA组术后肺炎患者明显更多,且需要重症监护病房治疗(分别为P = 0.030和0.038)。然而,两组在6个月死亡率方面无差异。
本研究表明,与瑞芬太尼全麻相比,PNB可能是糖尿病患者足部远端截肢的一个较好选择,尽管在死亡率方面无显著益处,因为PNB与术后镇痛改善、血流动力学稳定以及术后早期肺部并发症发生率低相关,尤其是在高危患者中。