Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Skin Res Technol. 2013 Nov;19(4):484-91. doi: 10.1111/srt.12072. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
We determined the intra- and inter-rater reliability of data from digital image color analysis between an expert and novice analyst.
Following training, the expert and novice independently analyzed 210 randomly ordered images. Both analysts used Adobe(®) Photoshop lasso or color sampler tools based on the type of image file. After color correction with Pictocolor(®) in camera software, they recorded Lab* (L*=light/dark; a*=red/green; b*=yellow/blue) color values for all skin sites. We computed intra-rater and inter-rater agreement within anatomical region, color value (L*, a*, b*), and technique (lasso, color sampler) using a series of one-way intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs).
Results of ICCs for intra-rater agreement showed high levels of internal consistency reliability within each rater for the lasso technique (ICC ≥ 0.99) and somewhat lower, yet acceptable, level of agreement for the color sampler technique (ICC = 0.91 for expert, ICC = 0.81 for novice). Skin L*, skin b*, and labia L* values reached the highest level of agreement (ICC ≥ 0.92) and skin a*, labia b*, and vaginal wall b* were the lowest (ICC ≥ 0.64).
Data from novice analysts can achieve high levels of agreement with data from expert analysts with training and the use of a detailed, standard protocol.
我们确定了专家和新手分析师之间数字图像颜色分析数据的组内和组间可靠性。
经过培训后,专家和新手分析师分别独立分析了 210 张随机排序的图像。两位分析师都根据图像文件的类型使用 Adobe(®)Photoshop 套索或颜色采样工具。在相机软件中的 Pictocolor(®)进行颜色校正后,他们记录了所有皮肤部位的 Lab*(L*=亮/暗;a*=红/绿;b*=黄/蓝)颜色值。我们使用一系列单向组内相关系数(ICC)计算了解剖区域内、颜色值(L*、a*、b*)和技术(套索、颜色采样器)的组内和组间一致性。
ICC 结果表明,对于套索技术,每个评分者的内部一致性可靠性都很高(ICC≥0.99),而对于颜色采样技术,一致性水平略低,但仍可接受(专家的 ICC=0.91,新手的 ICC=0.81)。皮肤 L*、皮肤 b和阴唇 L值达到了最高的一致性水平(ICC≥0.92),而皮肤 a*、阴唇 b和阴道壁 b的一致性水平最低(ICC≥0.64)。
经过培训和使用详细的标准协议,新手分析师的数据可以与专家分析师的数据达到高度一致。