Department of Health, Kinesiology & Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H4B 1R6, Canada.
PERFORM Centre, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H4B 1R6, Canada.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 May 20;57(5):512. doi: 10.3390/medicina57050512.
: Ultrasound echo intensity (EI) of the lumbar multifidus muscle (LMM) could offer valuable insights regarding muscle quality in people with low back pain (LBP). However, whether the rater's experience noticeably influences the reliability and precision of LMM EI measurements has not been established. The aims of this study were to investigate the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of LMM EI measurements, and to compare the reliability and SEM between a novice and an experienced rater. : Twenty athletes (10 females, 10 males) with a history of LBP were included in this study. Transverse ultrasound images of LMM were taken at L5 in prone. LMM EI measurements were obtained bilaterally by tracing the maximum ROI representing the LMM cross-sectional area (CSA), avoiding the inclusion of bone or surrounding fascia. All measurements were performed by two novice raters and an experienced researcher. Each measurement was acquired by each rater three times for each side on three different images, and the average was used in the analyses. Raters were blinded to each other's measurements and the participant's clinical information. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were obtained to assess the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability. : The intra-rater ICC values for the LMM measurements for the experienced rater were excellent (ICC all > 0.997). The inter-rater reliability ICC values showed moderate to excellent reliability (0.614 to 0.994) and agreement between the novice raters and the experienced rater, except for Novice 1 for the right LMM, which revealed lower ICCs and a wider 95% CI. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability results were similar when separately looking at the right and left side of the muscle and participant gender. : Our findings support the clinical use of ultrasound imaging for the assessment of LMM EI in individuals with LBP.
腰椎多裂肌(LMM)的超声回波强度(EI)可以为腰痛(LBP)患者的肌肉质量提供有价值的信息。然而,评估者的经验是否明显影响 LMM EI 测量的可靠性和精度尚未确定。本研究的目的是调查 LMM EI 测量的组内和组间可靠性,并比较新手和有经验的评估者之间的可靠性和 SEM。
本研究纳入了 20 名有 LBP 病史的运动员(10 名女性,10 名男性)。在俯卧位时,在 L5 处获取 LMM 的横向超声图像。通过追踪代表 LMM 横截面积(CSA)的最大 ROI 来获得 LMM EI 测量值,避免包括骨骼或周围筋膜。所有测量均由两名新手评估者和一名经验丰富的研究人员进行。每个评估者在三个不同的图像上对每侧进行三次测量,然后取平均值用于分析。评估者对彼此的测量值和参与者的临床信息均不知情。获得组内相关系数(ICCs)以评估组内和组间可靠性。
对于有经验的评估者,LMM 测量的组内 ICC 值为优秀(ICC 均> 0.997)。组间可靠性 ICC 值显示为中度至优秀的可靠性(0.614 至 0.994),并且新手评估者与有经验的评估者之间存在一致性,除了右侧 LMM 的新手 1 外,其 ICC 值较低且 95%CI 较宽。当分别观察肌肉的右侧和左侧以及参与者的性别时,组内和组间的可靠性结果相似。
我们的研究结果支持将超声成像用于评估 LBP 患者的 LMM EI 的临床应用。