John Gordon, Becker Jürgen, Schwarz Frank
Department of Oral Surgery, Westdeutsche Kieferklinik, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jul;25(7):838-42. doi: 10.1111/clr.12147. Epub 2013 Mar 31.
The purpose of this study was the evaluation of the effectiveness of plaque removing of a new rotating brush made of titanium in comparison with the cleaning procedure with steel curettes.
Plaque was collected by six volunteers for 48 h. A total of 60 samples were randomly designated to two groups: the test group TiBrush and the control group with steel curettes. The residual plaque area (RPA) and the treatment time were determined as parameters. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed for detecting possible damages of the treatment procedures.
The mean RPA within the TiBrush group (8.57 ± 4.85%) was significant lower than in the control group (28.99 ± 5.51%), while the mean treatment time was also significant lower in the TiBrush group (176.7 ± 15.2 sec) in comparison with the steel curettes (303.5 ± 11.5 sec). The outcomes of SEM analysis showed no surface alteration after TiBrush treatment.
Within the limits of this study, this investigation concludes that TiBrush seems to be more effective in plaque removing capacity, while being gentler to the implant surface than the processing with steel curettes. These promising results could hold out an improvement of conventional periimplantitis treatment. Further studies are needed to prove these outcomes.
本研究旨在评估一种新型钛制旋转刷与使用钢质刮治器的清洁程序相比,在去除牙菌斑方面的有效性。
6名志愿者收集牙菌斑48小时。总共60个样本被随机分为两组:测试组TiBrush和使用钢质刮治器的对照组。将残余牙菌斑面积(RPA)和治疗时间确定为参数。进行扫描电子显微镜(SEM)检查以检测治疗程序可能造成的损伤。
TiBrush组的平均RPA(8.57±4.85%)显著低于对照组(28.99±5.51%),并且TiBrush组的平均治疗时间(176.7±15.2秒)与使用钢质刮治器的组(303.5±11.5秒)相比也显著更短。SEM分析结果显示TiBrush治疗后表面无改变。
在本研究的范围内,本调查得出结论,TiBrush在去除牙菌斑能力方面似乎更有效,同时与使用钢质刮治器相比,对种植体表面更温和。这些有前景的结果可能会改善传统的种植体周围炎治疗。需要进一步的研究来证实这些结果。