Gynaecology Diagnostic and Outpatient Treatment Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College London Hospital, London, UK.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jun;41(6):696-701. doi: 10.1002/uog.12468. Epub 2013 May 7.
To investigate the feasibility of identifying pelvic segments of normal ureters and measuring their size on standard transvaginal ultrasound examination.
This was a prospective observational study from June to July 2012. All women in the study underwent a transvaginal ultrasound examination performed for various indications either by an expert or by an intermediate-level operator. A standardized assessment of the pelvic organs was performed, recording any congenital or acquired uterine pathology and ovarian abnormalities. Visualization of pelvic segments of both ureters was attempted in all cases. The success in finding the ureters, the time required to identify them and their dimensions at rest and while exhibiting peristalsis were all recorded.
A total of 245 consecutive women were included in the study. In all women at least one ureter was successfully identified. Both ureters were seen in 227 women (92.7% (95% CI, 89.4-96.0%)). In 17 (6.9% (95% CI, 3.7-10.1%)) the left ureter was not seen and in one woman (0.4% (95% CI, 0.0-1.2%)) the right ureter could not be visualized (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the median time required to visualize the right and left ureters (9.0 (interquartile range (IQR), 6.0-14.0) s vs 8.0 (IQR, 6.0 -14.0) s, respectively; P = 0.9). The median diameter of the right ureter was 1.7 (IQR, 1.4-2.2) mm at rest and 2.9 (IQR, 2.4-3.6) mm during peristalsis. The median diameter of the left ureter was 1.9 (IQR, 1.6-2.3) mm at rest and 2.9 (IQR, 2.4-3.6) mm during peristalsis.
Pelvic segments of normal ureters can be identified in most women on transvaginal ultrasound examination. Visualization of the ureters could be integrated into the routine pelvic ultrasound examination, particularly in women presenting with pelvic pain or in those with suspected pelvic endometriosis.
探讨在标准经阴道超声检查中识别正常输尿管盆腔段并测量其大小的可行性。
这是一项 2012 年 6 月至 7 月进行的前瞻性观察性研究。所有研究对象均接受经阴道超声检查,检查由专家或中级水平的操作人员进行,用于各种适应证。对盆腔器官进行标准化评估,记录任何先天性或获得性子宫病理学和卵巢异常。尝试在所有情况下均能可视化显示双侧输尿管的盆腔段。记录找到输尿管的成功率、识别它们所需的时间以及在静止和蠕动时的尺寸。
共纳入 245 例连续就诊的女性。所有女性至少有一侧输尿管被成功识别。227 例(92.7%(95%CI,89.4-96.0%))女性双侧输尿管均被显示。17 例(6.9%(95%CI,3.7-10.1%))女性左侧输尿管未被显示,1 例(0.4%(95%CI,0.0-1.2%))女性右侧输尿管无法可视化(P<0.001)。识别右侧和左侧输尿管所需的中位数时间无显著差异(9.0(四分位距(IQR),6.0-14.0)s 与 8.0(IQR,6.0-14.0)s,P=0.9)。输尿管静息状态下右侧输尿管的中位数直径为 1.7(IQR,1.4-2.2)mm,蠕动时为 2.9(IQR,2.4-3.6)mm。输尿管静息状态下左侧输尿管的中位数直径为 1.9(IQR,1.6-2.3)mm,蠕动时为 2.9(IQR,2.4-3.6)mm。
在大多数女性的经阴道超声检查中可以识别正常输尿管的盆腔段。输尿管的可视化可以整合到常规盆腔超声检查中,特别是在出现盆腔疼痛或疑似盆腔子宫内膜异位症的女性中。