Suppr超能文献

经阴道超声检查、造影剂增强计算机断层结肠成像及尿路造影期对盆腔后间隙深部浸润性子宫内膜异位症诊断价值的比较:一项初步研究

Comparison of transvaginal sonography and computed tomography-colonography with contrast media and urographic phase for diagnosing deep infiltrating endometriosis of the posterior compartment of the pelvis: a pilot study.

作者信息

Zannoni Letizia, Del Forno Simona, Coppola Francesca, Papadopoulos Dimitris, Valerio Domenico, Golfieri Rita, Caprara Giacomo, Paradisi Roberto, Seracchioli Renato

机构信息

Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, DIMEC, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Massarenti, 13, 40138, Bologna, Italy.

Radiology Unit, DIMES, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Jpn J Radiol. 2017 Sep;35(9):546-554. doi: 10.1007/s11604-017-0665-4. Epub 2017 Jul 12.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography (TVS) and computed tomography-colonography with contrast media and urographic phase (CTCU) in the preoperative detection of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-seven patients with clinical suspicion of DIE underwent preoperative TVS and CTCU. Imaging data were compared with histopathologic analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and test accuracies of the two modalities were calculated.

RESULTS

For diagnosing intestinal DIE, TVS and CTCU had a sensitivity of 98 and 71%, specificity of 33 and 50%, positive predictive value of 91 and 91%, negative predictive value of 67 and 20%, accuracy of 89 and 68%, respectively. For diagnosing ureteral DIE, TVS and CTCU had a sensitivity of 10 and 60%, specificity of 94.8 and 70.2% on the right; sensitivity of 28.5 and 57.1%, specificity of 96.3 and 76.9% on the left, respectively.

CONCLUSION

TVS should be regarded as an accurate, radiation-free first-line diagnostic modality for patients with suspicion of posterior endometriosis. CTCU should be regarded as a complementary imaging modality, particularly for sigmoid or ureteral endometriosis.

摘要

目的

比较经阴道超声检查(TVS)、含造影剂的计算机断层结肠成像及尿路造影期(CTCU)在术前检测深部浸润性子宫内膜异位症(DIE)中的诊断准确性。

材料与方法

47例临床怀疑为DIE的患者接受了术前TVS和CTCU检查。将影像数据与组织病理学分析结果进行比较。计算两种检查方法的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值以及检查准确性。

结果

对于诊断肠道DIE,TVS和CTCU的敏感性分别为98%和71%,特异性分别为33%和50%,阳性预测值分别为91%和91%,阴性预测值分别为67%和20%,准确性分别为89%和68%。对于诊断输尿管DIE,右侧TVS和CTCU的敏感性分别为10%和60%,特异性分别为94.8%和70.2%;左侧TVS和CTCU的敏感性分别为28.5%和57.1%,特异性分别为96.3%和76.9%。

结论

对于怀疑有深部子宫内膜异位症的患者,TVS应被视为一种准确、无辐射的一线诊断方法。CTCU应被视为一种辅助成像方法,特别是对于乙状结肠或输尿管子宫内膜异位症。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验