• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针灸临床试验的注册质量评估。

Registration quality assessment of acupuncture clinical trials.

机构信息

Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059506. Epub 2013 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0059506
PMID:23555686
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3610907/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Registration can help with transparency of acupuncture clinical trials (ACTs) by making protocol information and results available to the public. Recently, the number of registered ACTs has increased greatly, but only a few researchers have focused on the quality of ACTs registration. This review provides the first assessment of the registration quality of ACTs and the baseline information for future development.

METHODS

All records of ACTs registered in the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) were collected. Data was extracted and input to Excel spreadsheets. The current 20 items of the WHO Trial Registration Data Set (TRDS) and the special prepared items for acupuncture intervention details were used to assess the registration quality of ACTs.

RESULTS

A total of 740 records, found in 11 registries, were examined. The number of registered ACTs increased rapidly and involved a number of different diseases. The completeness of 20 items was not too poor due to 16 of them had a higher reported percentage (>85%). The completeness of the 20 items was different among registries. For example, the average registration percentage of 20 items in Clinicaltrials.gov, ChiCTR, ISRCTN and ANZCTR were 89.6%, 92.2%, 82.4% and 91.6% respectively. Detailed information regarding acupuncture intervention was seriously insufficient. Among the 740 registration records, 89.2% lacked information on the style of acupuncture, 80.8% did not contain details regarding the needles used, 53.5% lacked information on the treatment regimen and 76.2% did not give details of other interventions administered with acupuncture.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall registration quality of ACTs is not high enough due to the serious lack of information on the specifics of acupuncture intervention. It is vital that a number of special items be set regarding acupuncture in order to develop a suitable system for the registration of ACTs.

摘要

背景

注册可以通过向公众提供方案信息和结果来提高针灸临床试验(ACTs)的透明度。最近,注册的 ACT 数量大大增加,但只有少数研究人员关注 ACT 注册的质量。本综述首次评估了 ACTs 的注册质量,并为未来的发展提供了基线信息。

方法

收集了世界卫生组织(WHO)国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)中所有 ACTs 的记录。提取数据并输入 Excel 电子表格。使用当前的 WHO 试验注册数据集(TRDS)的 20 项和专门为针灸干预细节准备的特殊项目来评估 ACTs 的注册质量。

结果

共检查了 11 个注册中心的 740 个记录。注册的 ACT 数量迅速增加,涉及许多不同的疾病。由于其中 16 项报告的比例较高(>85%),20 项的完整性不是太差。各注册中心的 20 项完整性不同。例如,Clinicaltrials.gov、ChiCTR、ISRCTN 和 ANZCTR 的 20 项注册平均百分比分别为 89.6%、92.2%、82.4%和 91.6%。关于针灸干预的详细信息严重不足。在 740 个注册记录中,89.2%缺乏针灸方式的信息,80.8%未包含有关使用的针的详细信息,53.5%缺乏治疗方案的信息,76.2%未提供与针灸一起进行的其他干预措施的详细信息。

结论

由于缺乏针灸干预细节的严重信息,ACTs 的整体注册质量不够高。有必要为针灸制定一些特殊项目,以开发适合 ACTs 注册的系统。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ed0/3610907/285cd0a7ab37/pone.0059506.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ed0/3610907/32a7e1bb516b/pone.0059506.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ed0/3610907/285cd0a7ab37/pone.0059506.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ed0/3610907/32a7e1bb516b/pone.0059506.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ed0/3610907/285cd0a7ab37/pone.0059506.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Registration quality assessment of acupuncture clinical trials.针灸临床试验的注册质量评估。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059506. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
2
Quality assessment of clinical trial registration with traditional Chinese medicine in WHO registries.世界卫生组织注册机构中中医药临床试验注册的质量评估
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 19;9(2):e025218. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025218.
3
[Establishing the acupuncture-moxibustion clinical trial registry and improving the transparence of clinical trials of acupuncture and moxibustion].[建立针灸临床试验注册制度,提高针灸临床试验透明度]
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2017 Jul 12;37(7):685-689. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.2017.07.001.
4
[Analysis and discussion on current condition of acupuncture clinical research registration].[针灸临床研究注册现状分析与探讨]
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2015 Jun;35(6):605-7.
5
Assessment of Registration Information on Methodological Design of Acupuncture RCTs: A Review of 453 Registration Records Retrieved from WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform.针灸 RCT 方法学设计注册信息评估:从世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台检索到的 453 份注册记录综述。
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014;2014:614850. doi: 10.1155/2014/614850. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
6
[Method and current situations on acupuncture clinical trial registration in the world].[世界针灸临床试验注册的方法与现状]
Zhen Ci Yan Jiu. 2012 Feb;37(1):86, inside back cover.
7
Trial registration as a safeguard against outcome reporting bias and spin? A case study of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture.注册临床试验以防止结果报告偏倚和歪曲?一项针灸随机对照试验的案例研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 3;14(10):e0223305. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223305. eCollection 2019.
8
Calling for improved quality in the registration of traditional Chinese medicine during the public health emergency: a survey of trial registries for COVID-19, H1N1, and SARS.呼吁提高公共卫生应急期间中医药注册质量:对 COVID-19、H1N1 和 SARS 临床试验注册的调查。
Trials. 2021 Mar 5;22(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05113-y.
9
The quality of registration of clinical trials.临床试验注册的质量。
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 24;6(2):e14701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014701.
10
Exploring qualitative methods reported in registered trials and their yields (EQUITY): systematic review.探索注册试验中报告的定性方法及其产出(EQUITY):系统评价
Trials. 2018 Oct 29;19(1):589. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2983-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Calling for improved quality in the registration of traditional Chinese medicine during the public health emergency: a survey of trial registries for COVID-19, H1N1, and SARS.呼吁提高公共卫生应急期间中医药注册质量:对 COVID-19、H1N1 和 SARS 临床试验注册的调查。
Trials. 2021 Mar 5;22(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05113-y.
2
WHO Trial Registration Data Set (TRDS) extension for traditional Chinese medicine 2020: recommendations, explanation, and elaboration.世界卫生组织临床试验注册数据集(TRDS)2020 年中医药扩展版:建议、说明和详细阐释。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jul 17;20(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01077-w.
3

本文引用的文献

1
[Method and current situations on acupuncture clinical trial registration in the world].[世界针灸临床试验注册的方法与现状]
Zhen Ci Yan Jiu. 2012 Feb;37(1):86, inside back cover.
2
The quality of registration of clinical trials.临床试验注册的质量。
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 24;6(2):e14701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014701.
3
Assessment of registration quality of trials sponsored by China.评估中国资助的试验注册质量。
Clinical trial registration, and publication in acupuncture studies: A systematic review.
针灸研究中的临床试验注册与发表:一项系统综述
Integr Med Res. 2020 Mar;9(1):56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2020.01.008. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
4
Quality assessment of clinical trial registration with traditional Chinese medicine in WHO registries.世界卫生组织注册机构中中医药临床试验注册的质量评估
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 19;9(2):e025218. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025218.
5
Need for Registration and Reporting of Acupuncture Trials in Parkinson's Disease in Korea.韩国帕金森病针灸试验的注册与报告需求
J Mov Disord. 2017 Sep;10(3):130-134. doi: 10.14802/jmd.17047. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
J Evid Based Med. 2009 Feb;2(1):8-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-5391.2009.01007.x.
4
From Mexico to Mali: four years in the history of clinical trial registration.从墨西哥到马里:临床试验注册历史的四年。
J Evid Based Med. 2009 Feb;2(1):1-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-5391.2009.01014.x.
5
Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): extending the CONSORT statement.修订后的针刺临床试验干预报告标准(STRICTA):扩展 CONSORT 声明。
PLoS Med. 2010 Jun 8;7(6):e1000261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000261.
6
Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence.研究证据生产与报告中的可避免浪费。
Lancet. 2009 Jul 4;374(9683):86-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60329-9. Epub 2009 Jun 12.
7
Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias.关于研究发表偏倚和结果报告偏倚实证证据的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2008 Aug 28;3(8):e3081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003081.
8
[Critical appraisal of randomized clinical trials in Chinese Acupuncture and Moxibustion from 2000 to 2006].《2000年至2006年中国针灸随机临床试验的批判性评价》
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2008 Jun;28(6):439-43.
9
Chinese authors do need CONSORT: reporting quality assessment for five leading Chinese medical journals.中国作者确实需要CONSORT:对五家中国顶级医学期刊的报告质量评估
Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 Sep;29(5):727-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.05.003. Epub 2008 May 18.
10
[Acupuncture clinical studies and evidence-based medicine--an update].
Zhen Ci Yan Jiu. 2008 Feb;33(1):53-61.