• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜肝切除术治疗结直肠肝转移瘤——回顾性对比队列分析及文献复习。

Laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatic colorectal metastases -- a retrospective comparative cohort analysis and literature review.

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Cheng du, Sichuan Province, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e60153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060153. Epub 2013 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0060153
PMID:23555908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3605322/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) for management of hepatic colorectal metastases (HCRM) is commonly being performed; however, there are limited reports comparing LH outcomes with those of open hepatectomy (OH) procedure. The aim of the present study was to compare perioperative outcomes between the LH and OH procedures performed at a single medical center.

METHODS

From Jan 2008 to May 2012, 30 patients with pathologically confirmed HCRM underwent LH, and 140 patients underwent OH at our hospital. Patients' demographics, perioperative outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

2 patients (6.7%) in the LH group underwent laparotomies for intraoperative hemorrhage. The LH group had an increased surgical duration (235 min vs. 365 min, (P<0.001), shorter hospital stay (7.5 days vs. 11.5 days, P<0.001), and fewer complications (26.2% vs. 55%, P<0.001) than the OH group. However, in a matched cohort comparison of 30 LH cases and 30 OH cases, no significant variations were observed in the following parameters: surgical duration (235 min vs. 255 min, P = 0.23), positive margin rates (6.7% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.27), or postoperative hematological changes. LH patients had less estimated blood loss (215 ml vs. 385 ml, P<0.001), less morbidity (26.2% vs. 50%, P = 0.02), shorter hospital stay (7.5 days vs. 11.5 days, P<0.001), and lower analgesic requests than with those in the OH group.

CONCLUSIONS

LH for metastatic colorectal cancer is a safe and feasible treatment, even in patients who underwent prior laparotomy surgeries and provides significantly less morbidity and shorter hospital stay than OH, without compromising curability or increasing morbidity.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜肝切除术(LH)常用于治疗结直肠肝转移(HCRM);然而,将 LH 与开腹肝切除术(OH)的结果进行比较的报道有限。本研究旨在比较单中心 LH 和 OH 手术的围手术期结果。

方法

2008 年 1 月至 2012 年 5 月,30 例经病理证实的 HCRM 患者接受 LH,140 例患者在我院接受 OH。回顾性分析患者的人口统计学和围手术期结果。

结果

LH 组有 2 例(6.7%)患者因术中出血行剖腹术。LH 组手术时间(235 分钟 vs. 365 分钟,P<0.001)、住院时间(7.5 天 vs. 11.5 天,P<0.001)和并发症(26.2% vs. 55%,P<0.001)均少于 OH 组。然而,在 30 例 LH 病例和 30 例 OH 病例的匹配队列比较中,手术时间(235 分钟 vs. 255 分钟,P = 0.23)、阳性切缘率(6.7% vs. 0.0%,P = 0.27)或术后血液学变化无显著差异。LH 患者出血量(215 毫升 vs. 385 毫升,P<0.001)、发病率(26.2% vs. 50%,P = 0.02)、住院时间(7.5 天 vs. 11.5 天,P<0.001)和镇痛需求均少于 OH 组。

结论

LH 治疗转移性结直肠癌是一种安全可行的治疗方法,即使是在先前接受过剖腹手术的患者中也是如此,与 OH 相比,LH 可显著降低发病率和缩短住院时间,而不会影响治愈率或增加发病率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b017/3605322/9da64cf799e1/pone.0060153.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b017/3605322/9da64cf799e1/pone.0060153.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b017/3605322/9da64cf799e1/pone.0060153.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatic colorectal metastases -- a retrospective comparative cohort analysis and literature review.腹腔镜肝切除术治疗结直肠肝转移瘤——回顾性对比队列分析及文献复习。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e60153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060153. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
2
Laparoscopic hepatectomy is associated with considerably less morbidity and a long-term survival similar to that of the open procedure in patients with hepatic colorectal metastases.对于患有肝结肠转移瘤的患者,腹腔镜肝切除术的发病率显著较低,且长期生存率与开腹手术相似。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014 Dec;24(6):517-22. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31829cec2b.
3
Comparison of short-term outcomes in laparoscopic vs open hepatectomy.腹腔镜肝切除术与开腹肝切除术的短期疗效比较。
JAMA Surg. 2014 Sep;149(9):941-6. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1023.
4
Laparoscopic hepatectomy is safe and effective for the management of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases in a population-based analysis in Ontario, Canada. A retrospective cohort study.基于加拿大安大略省的人群分析,腹腔镜肝切除术对于结直肠癌肝转移患者的管理是安全有效的。一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2020 Nov;83:47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.08.052. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
5
Laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for elderly patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer.老年结直肠癌肝转移患者的腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术对比
J BUON. 2016 Sept-Oct;21(5):1146-1152.
6
Laparoscopic hepatectomy is superior to open procedures for hepatic hemangioma.腹腔镜肝切除术优于开腹手术治疗肝血管瘤。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2021 Apr;20(2):142-146. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2020.09.001. Epub 2020 Sep 13.
7
Laparoscopic resection of hepatic alveolar echinococcosis: A single-center experience.腹腔镜下肝泡型包虫病切除术:单中心经验。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022 Sep 6;16(9):e0010708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010708. eCollection 2022 Sep.
8
Impact on operative outcomes of laparoscopic simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases.腹腔镜同期切除结直肠癌和同步肝转移对手术结果的影响。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2021 Jan;14(1):34-43. doi: 10.1111/ases.12802. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
9
Postoperative Nutritional Assessment of Laparoscopic Open Partial Hepatectomy.腹腔镜与开腹肝部分切除术术后营养评估。
Anticancer Res. 2024 Sep;44(9):3931-3936. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.17221.
10
Long-term results of laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-matched analysis.腹腔镜肝切除术与开腹肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的长期疗效:病例匹配分析。
World J Surg. 2011 Oct;35(10):2268-74. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1212-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Forward We Go!我们向前迈进!
JSLS. 2023 Jan-Mar;27(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00073.
2
Minimally invasive versus open hepatectomy for the resection of colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创与开腹肝切除术治疗结直肠癌肝转移的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Nov;36(11):7915-7937. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09612-0. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
3
Laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases - short- and long-term outcomes: A systematic review.腹腔镜下肝切除治疗结直肠癌肝转移——短期和长期疗效:一项系统评价

本文引用的文献

1
Oncological efficiency analysis of laparoscopic liver resection for primary and metastatic cancer: a single-center UK experience.原发性和转移性癌症腹腔镜肝切除的肿瘤学疗效分析:英国单中心经验
Arch Surg. 2012 Jan;147(1):42-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.856.
2
Perioperative and long-term results after left pancreatectomy: a single-institution, non-randomized, comparative study between open and laparoscopic approach.左胰切除术的围手术期和长期结果:单中心、非随机、开放与腹腔镜方法比较研究。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Sep;25(9):2871-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1634-0. Epub 2011 Mar 18.
3
Laparoscopic major hepatectomy can be safely performed with colorectal surgery for synchronous colorectal liver metastasis.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021 Jul 15;13(7):732-757. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i7.732.
4
A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the short- and long-term outcomes for laparoscopic and open liver resections for liver metastases from colorectal cancer.系统评价和荟萃分析比较腹腔镜和开腹肝切除术治疗结直肠癌肝转移的短期和长期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):349-360. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06774-2. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
5
A Match-Pair Analysis of Open Versus Laparoscopic Liver Surgery.开腹与腹腔镜肝脏手术的配对分析
JSLS. 2017 Oct-Dec;21(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2017.00061.
6
Laparoscopic liver resection in metastatic colorectal cancer treatment: comparison with long-term results using the conventional approach.腹腔镜肝切除术在转移性结直肠癌治疗中的应用:与传统方法的长期结果比较。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2017 Oct 24;11:775. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2017.775. eCollection 2017.
7
Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗结直肠癌肝转移的比较:一项全面的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 21;7(1):1012. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00978-z.
8
Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗结直肠癌肝转移的Meta分析
Oncotarget. 2016 Dec 20;7(51):84544-84555. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13026.
9
Laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for colorectal cancer liver metastases: comparative study with propensity score matching.腹腔镜肝切除术与开腹肝切除术治疗结直肠癌肝转移:倾向评分匹配的比较研究
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2016 Aug;5(4):290-9. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2015.12.06.
10
Laparoscopic liver resection: Experience based guidelines.腹腔镜肝切除术:基于经验的指南
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Jan 27;8(1):5-26. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i1.5.
腹腔镜下肝切除术可与结直肠外科联合安全进行,用于治疗同时性结直肠肝转移。
HPB (Oxford). 2011 Jan;13(1):46-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00238.x. Epub 2010 Nov 25.
4
Laparoscopic resection of colorectal liver metastases: surgical and long-term oncologic outcome.腹腔镜下结直肠转移瘤切除术:手术和长期肿瘤学结果。
Ann Surg. 2010 Dec;252(6):1005-12. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181f66954.
5
Simultaneous laparoscopic resection of primary colorectal cancer and metastatic liver tumor: initial experience of single institute.同时性腹腔镜下原发性结直肠癌和肝转移瘤切除术:单中心的初步经验
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010 Oct;20(8):683-7. doi: 10.1089/lap.2010.0039.
6
Comparison of laparoscopic and open colorectal resections for patients undergoing simultaneous R0 resection for liver metastases.腹腔镜与开腹结直肠切除术治疗同期肝转移瘤 R0 切除患者的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Jan;25(1):193-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1158-z. Epub 2010 Jun 12.
7
Short- and medium-term results of totally laparoscopic resection for colorectal liver metastases.腹腔镜结直肠肝转移瘤完全切除术的近期和中期结果。
Br J Surg. 2010 Jun;97(6):927-33. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7034.
8
Laparoscopic liver resection for malignant and benign lesions: ten-year Norwegian single-center experience.腹腔镜肝切除术治疗恶性和良性病变:挪威单中心十年经验
Arch Surg. 2010 Jan;145(1):34-40. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.229.
9
Laparoscopic resection for liver tumors: initial experience in a single center.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009 Oct;19(5):388-91. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181bb9333.
10
Minimally invasive liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional, international report of safety, feasibility, and early outcomes.转移性结直肠癌的微创肝切除术:一项多机构、国际范围的安全性、可行性及早期结果报告。
Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):842-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bc789c.