SISSA, International School for Advances Studies, Cognitive Neuroscience Department, via Bonomea, 265, 34136 Trieste, Italy.
Cognition. 2013 Jul;128(1):13-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.014. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
The classic gavagai problem exemplifies the difficulty to identify the referent of a novel word uttered in a foreign language. Here, we consider the reverse problem: identifying the referential part of a label. Assuming "gavagai" indicates a rabbit in a foreign language, it may very well mean "a rabbit" or "that rabbit". How can a learner know whether rabbit is actually said "vagai", "gava" or "gavagai"? Here, we report evidence suggesting that infants can identify potential function words on the basis of their high frequency and avoid considering them when associating labels and referents. In three experiments, 17-month-old infants were first exposed to an artificial speech stream where frequent and infrequent syllables alternated (e.g., … gibuvokugifevodegita…). Infants then saw a novel object and heard the repetition of a bisyllabic label consisting of one frequent and one infrequent syllable (e.g., vomu). The frequent syllable was the initial syllable of the label in Experiment 1 and the final in Experiments 2 and 3. We then presented infants with both the previous and now familiar object and a novel object. We asked whether infants would be more likely to orient first towards the familiar object when hearing a label with a new frequent and the previous infrequent syllables (e.g., gimu), or when hearing a label with a new infrequent and the previous frequent syllables (e.g., vona). Results suggest that the infrequent syllable was associated more strongly with the object, than the frequent one, only when the perceived position of the frequent syllable was constant all along the experiment.
经典的 gavagai 问题说明了在识别外语中一个新词的指称时的困难。在这里,我们考虑相反的问题:识别标签的指称部分。假设“gavagai”在一种外语中表示兔子,它可能意味着“一只兔子”或“那只兔子”。学习者怎么知道 rabbit 实际上是否被说成“vagai”、“gava”或“gavagai”?在这里,我们报告了一些证据,表明婴儿可以根据它们的高频来识别潜在的功能词,并在将标签和指称联系起来时避免考虑它们。在三个实验中,17 个月大的婴儿首先暴露于一个交替出现高频和低频音节的人工语音流中(例如,… gibuvokugifevodegita…)。然后,婴儿看到一个新的物体,并听到一个由一个高频和一个低频音节组成的双音节标签的重复(例如,vomu)。在实验 1 中,高频音节是标签的首音节,而在实验 2 和 3 中则是尾音节。然后,我们向婴儿展示了之前的和现在熟悉的物体以及一个新的物体。我们问婴儿在听到一个新的高频和之前的低频音节的标签(例如,gimu)时,或者在听到一个新的低频和之前的高频音节的标签(例如,vona)时,是否更有可能首先朝向熟悉的物体。结果表明,只有在整个实验中高频音节的感知位置保持不变时,低频音节才与物体更紧密地联系在一起。