Suppr超能文献

句法。

Syntax.

作者信息

Adger David

机构信息

Queen Mary, University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2015 Mar;6(2):131-147. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1332. Epub 2014 Dec 10.

Abstract

Syntax is the cognitive capacity of human beings that allows us to connect linguistic meaning with linguistic form. The study of syntax is a huge field that has generated a great deal of empirical and theoretical work over the decades. This article outlines why understanding our syntactic capacity is important to cognitive science in general and why the data of syntactic research is to be taken seriously. It then provides an overview of a number of broad findings about the character of the syntax of human language, including evidence for abstract constituent structure, core properties of constituents, the importance of functional categories, the link between syntactic structure and meaning, and the range of types of syntactic dependencies, including dependencies of form, dependencies of position, and dependencies that create new meanings. WIREs Cogn Sci 2015, 6:131-147. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1332 This article is categorized under: Linguistics > Language in Mind and Brain Linguistics > Linguistic Theory Psychology > Language.

摘要

句法是人类的一种认知能力,它使我们能够将语言意义与语言形式联系起来。句法研究是一个庞大的领域,在过去几十年里产生了大量的实证和理论研究成果。本文概述了为何理解我们的句法能力对认知科学总体而言很重要,以及为何句法研究数据应得到重视。接着,本文概述了关于人类语言句法特征的一些广泛研究发现,包括抽象成分结构的证据、成分的核心属性、功能类别的重要性、句法结构与意义之间的联系,以及句法依存关系的类型范围,包括形式依存关系、位置依存关系以及创造新意义的依存关系。《WIREs 认知科学》2015 年,6:131 - 147。doi: 10.1002/wcs.1332 本文分类如下:语言学>心智与大脑中的语言;语言学>语言理论;心理学>语言。

相似文献

1
Syntax.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2015 Mar;6(2):131-147. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1332. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
2
Lack of selectivity for syntax relative to word meanings throughout the language network.
Cognition. 2020 Oct;203:104348. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104348. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
3
Information structure: linguistic, cognitive, and processing approaches.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2013 Jul;4(4):403-413. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1234. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
4
Parsing.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2011 Jul;2(4):353-364. doi: 10.1002/wcs.112. Epub 2010 Oct 27.
5
Embodiment and language.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2023 Sep-Oct;14(5):e1649. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1649. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
6
Cognitive linguistics.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2012 Mar;3(2):129-141. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1163. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
7
Encoding individuals in language using syntax, words, and pragmatic inference.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2016 Sep;7(5):341-53. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1396. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
8
A Dynamic Network Approach to the Study of Syntax.
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 23;11:604853. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.604853. eCollection 2020.
9
Long-range sequential dependencies precede complex syntactic production in language acquisition.
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Mar 9;289(1970):20212657. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2657.
10
The simpler syntax hypothesis.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Sep;10(9):413-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.07.007. Epub 2006 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Language-specific neural dynamics extend syntax into the time domain.
PLoS Biol. 2025 Jan 21;23(1):e3002968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002968. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
The 'Comparative Logic' and Why We Need to Explain Interlanguage Grammars.
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 25;12:717635. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717635. eCollection 2021.
3
Universals of word order reflect optimization of grammars for efficient communication.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Feb 4;117(5):2347-2353. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1910923117. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
4
Linguistic explanation and domain specialization: a case study in bound variable anaphora.
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 24;6:1421. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01421. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

1
Language learners privilege structured meaning over surface frequency.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 22;111(16):5842-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320525111. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
2
Word frequency, function words and the second gavagai problem.
Cognition. 2013 Jul;128(1):13-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.014. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
3
The Leaf Fell (the Leaf): The Online Processing of Unaccusatives.
Linguist Inq. 2008 Summer;39(3):355-377. doi: 10.1162/ling.2008.39.3.355. Epub 2008 Jun 20.
5
The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function.
Physiol Rev. 2011 Oct;91(4):1357-92. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00006.2011.
6
Weak quantitative standards in linguistics research.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Jun;14(6):233-4; discussion 234-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.03.005. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
7
Speech perception and language acquisition in the first year of life.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2010;61:191-218. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100408.
8
A comparison of brain activity evoked by single content and function words: an fMRI investigation of implicit word processing.
Brain Res. 2009 Jul 28;1282:38-49. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.043. Epub 2009 May 22.
9
Structural priming: a critical review.
Psychol Bull. 2008 May;134(3):427-59. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.427.
10
The simpler syntax hypothesis.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Sep;10(9):413-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.07.007. Epub 2006 Aug 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验