Suppr超能文献

两种治疗性髌股带扎技术对力量、耐力和疼痛反应的影响。

The effects of two therapeutic patellofemoral taping techniques on strength, endurance, and pain responses.

机构信息

Athletic Training Research Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, 146 Recreation Building, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

出版信息

Phys Ther Sport. 2013 Nov;14(4):199-206. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2012.09.006. Epub 2013 Apr 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of taping techniques on clinical measures in patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) patients.

DESIGN

Crossover experimental design.

SETTING

Controlled laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty physically active PFPS patients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Isokinetic strength and endurance, and perceived pain.

RESULTS

Bilateral baseline differences existed for strength (involved = 1.8 ± 0.5 Nm/kg; uninvolved = 2.1 ± 0.5 Nm/kg; p = 0.001) and endurance (involved = 35.6 ± 14.0 J/kg; uninvolved = 40.2 ± 12.9 J/kg; p = 0.013). Strength (McConnell = 2.1 ± 0.6 Nm/kg, 95% SCI = (1.1, 4.2); Spider(®) = 2.1 ± 0.5 Nm/kg, 95% SCI = (0.9, 4.0)) and endurance (McConnell = 42.9 ± 13.8 J/kg, 95% SCI = (2.9, 11.6); Spider(®) = 42.5 ± 11.0 J/kg, 95% SCI = (2.6, -11.3)) increased when taped compared to baseline. Pain decreased during strength (baseline = 3.0 ± 2.2 cm; McConnell = 1.9 ± 1.7 cm, 95% SCI = (-1.8, -0.4); Spider(®) = 1.6 ± 2.0 cm, 95% SCI = (-2.0, -0.5)) and endurance (baseline = 2.5 ± 2.0 cm; McConnell = 1.5 ± 1.8 cm, 95% SCI = (-1.6, -0.4); Spider(®) = 1.1 ± 0.8 cm, 95% SCI = (-1.7, -0.5)) measurements when taped. Differences between taping techniques were insignificant.

CONCLUSIONS

Taping improved clinical measures in PFPS patients. No differences existed between Spider(®) and McConnell techniques.

摘要

目的

比较贴扎技术对髌股疼痛综合征(PFPS)患者临床指标的影响。

设计

交叉实验设计。

设置

对照实验室。

参与者

20 名活跃的 PFPS 患者。

主要观察指标

等速力量和耐力,以及感知疼痛。

结果

双侧基线存在力量差异(患侧=1.8±0.5 Nm/kg;健侧=2.1±0.5 Nm/kg;p=0.001)和耐力差异(患侧=35.6±14.0 J/kg;健侧=40.2±12.9 J/kg;p=0.013)。力量(McConnell=2.1±0.6 Nm/kg,95%CI=(1.1,4.2);Spider(®)=2.1±0.5 Nm/kg,95%CI=(0.9,4.0))和耐力(McConnell=42.9±13.8 J/kg,95%CI=(2.9,11.6);Spider(®)=42.5±11.0 J/kg,95%CI=(2.6,-11.3))在贴扎后与基线相比均增加。与基线相比,在力量(基线=3.0±2.2 cm;McConnell=1.9±1.7 cm,95%CI=(-1.8,-0.4);Spider(®)=1.6±2.0 cm,95%CI=(-2.0,-0.5))和耐力(基线=2.5±2.0 cm;McConnell=1.5±1.8 cm,95%CI=(-1.6,-0.4);Spider(®)=1.1±0.8 cm,95%CI=(-1.7,-0.5))测量时疼痛均降低。两种贴扎技术之间的差异无统计学意义。

结论

贴扎技术改善了 PFPS 患者的临床指标。Spider(®)和 McConnell 技术之间没有差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验