Logan Catherine A, Bhashyam Abhiram R, Tisosky Ashley J, Haber Daniel B, Jorgensen Anna, Roy Adam, Provencher Matthew T
Sports Health. 2017 Sep/Oct;9(5):456-461. doi: 10.1177/1941738117710938. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
Taping is commonly used in the management of several musculoskeletal conditions, including patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS). Specific guidelines for taping are unknown.
To investigate the efficacy of knee taping in the management of PFPS. Our hypothesis was that tension taping and exercise would be superior to placebo taping and exercise as well as to exercise or taping alone.
The PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane, Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine Source, and CINAHL databases were reviewed for English-language randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of various taping techniques that were published between 1995 and April 2015. Keywords utilized included taping, McConnell, kinesio-taping, kinesiotaping, patellofemoral pain, and knee.
Studies included consisted of RCTs (level 1 or 2) with participants of all ages who had anterior knee or patellofemoral pain symptoms and had received nonsurgical management using any taping technique.
Systematic review.
Level 2.
A checklist method was used to determine selection, performance, detection, and attrition bias for each article. A quality of evidence grading was then referenced using the validated PEDro database for RCTs. Three difference comparison groups were compared: tension taping and exercise versus placebo taping and exercise (group 1), placebo taping and exercise versus exercise alone (group 2), and tension taping and exercise versus taping alone (group 3).
Five RCTs with 235 total patients with multiple intervention arms were included. Taping strategies included McConnell and Kinesiotaping. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores indicated improvement in all 3 comparison groups (group 1: 91 patients, 39% of total, mean VAS improvement 44.9 [tension taping + exercise] vs 66 [placebo taping + exercise]; group 2: 56 patients, 24% of total, mean VAS improvement 66 [placebo taping + exercise] vs 47.6 [exercise alone]; and group 3: 112 patients, 48% of total, mean VAS improvement 44.9 [tension taping + exercise] vs 14.1 [taping alone]).
This systematic review supports knee taping only as an adjunct to traditional exercise therapy for PFPS; however, it does not support taping in isolation.
贴扎常用于多种肌肉骨骼疾病的治疗,包括髌股疼痛综合征(PFPS)。贴扎的具体指南尚不清楚。
探讨膝关节贴扎对PFPS的治疗效果。我们的假设是,张力贴扎联合运动优于安慰剂贴扎联合运动,也优于单纯运动或单纯贴扎。
检索了PubMed/MEDLINE、Cochrane、康复与运动医学资源库以及CINAHL数据库,以查找1995年至2015年4月期间发表的评估各种贴扎技术疗效的英文随机对照试验(RCT)。使用的关键词包括贴扎、麦康奈尔贴扎法、肌内效贴扎、肌内效贴布、髌股疼痛和膝关节。
纳入的研究包括RCT(1级或2级),参与者为各年龄段,有膝关节前部或髌股疼痛症状,并接受了使用任何贴扎技术的非手术治疗。
系统评价。
2级。
采用清单法确定每篇文章的选择、实施、检测和失访偏倚。然后使用经过验证的PEDro数据库对RCT的证据质量进行分级。比较了三个不同的对照组:张力贴扎联合运动与安慰剂贴扎联合运动(第1组)、安慰剂贴扎联合运动与单纯运动(第2组)、张力贴扎联合运动与单纯贴扎(第3组)。
纳入了5项RCT,共有235例患者,设有多个干预组。贴扎策略包括麦康奈尔贴扎法和肌内效贴扎。视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分显示,所有3个对照组均有改善(第1组:91例患者,占总数的39%,VAS平均改善44.9 [张力贴扎 + 运动] 对比66 [安慰剂贴扎 + 运动];第2组:56例患者,占总数的24%,VAS平均改善66 [安慰剂贴扎 + 运动] 对比47.6 [单纯运动];第3组:112例患者,占总数的48%,VAS平均改善44.9 [张力贴扎 + 运动] 对比14.1 [单纯贴扎])。
本系统评价支持膝关节贴扎仅作为PFPS传统运动疗法的辅助手段;然而,不支持单独使用贴扎。