Suppr超能文献

恶性心包填塞

Malignant pericardial tamponade.

作者信息

Rinkevich D, Borovik R, Bendett M, Markiewicz W

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Rambam Medical Center, Technion Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

Med Pediatr Oncol. 1990;18(4):287-91. doi: 10.1002/mpo.2950180406.

Abstract

We studied the clinical course and management of 27 patients with malignant pericardial tamponade seen in a single Medical Center over a 10 year period. Patients treated with repeat pericardial tap as their only mode of therapy had a high rate of recurrent tamponade (6 of 13 subjects) whereas most patients treated with drainage (either surgical or percutaneous) had sustained control of their pericardial effusion (achieved in 10/13 subjects). Intra-pericardial instillation of tetracycline or cyclophosphamide did not clearly improve the good results obtained with drainage alone. Extensive pericardiectomy was required in 2 patients only. Irrespective of the mode of therapy, survival was poor in patients with carcinoma of lung (N = 10) with a median survival of 30 days only vs. 135 days for patients with breast carcinoma (N = 10). Patients with malignant pericardial tamponade are best treated with immediate drainage. Percutaneous and sub-xiphoid surgical drainage are equally effective. Despite invasion of the pericardium by carcinoma, patients with a good oncologic prognosis may enjoy an appreciable survival with adequate quality of life following relief of tamponade.

摘要

我们研究了在一家医疗中心10年间收治的27例恶性心包填塞患者的临床病程及治疗情况。仅接受反复心包穿刺作为唯一治疗方式的患者,心包填塞复发率较高(13例中有6例),而大多数接受引流治疗(手术或经皮引流)的患者心包积液得到了持续控制(13例中有10例)。心包腔内注入四环素或环磷酰胺并未明显改善单纯引流所取得的良好效果。仅2例患者需要进行广泛心包切除术。无论采用何种治疗方式,肺癌患者(n = 10)的生存率都很低,中位生存期仅为30天,而乳腺癌患者(n = 10)为135天。恶性心包填塞患者最好立即进行引流治疗。经皮引流和剑突下手术引流同样有效。尽管心包已被癌侵犯,但肿瘤预后良好的患者在解除心包填塞后,可能会有可观的生存期并拥有较高的生活质量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验