• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

明尼苏达农场家庭的医疗保险覆盖范围。

Health insurance coverage of Minnesota farm families.

作者信息

Kralewski J E, Shapiro J, Chan H C, Edwards K, Liu Y L

机构信息

Division of Health Services Research and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

出版信息

Minn Med. 1990 May;73(5):35-8.

PMID:2355907
Abstract

This study of 1,482 farm families assesses the extent and cost of health insurance coverage among Minnesota farm families and finds that these families are buying less insurance coverage than urban families, while paying a higher proportion of their income for these premiums. More than three-fourths of the farm families surveyed buy their health insurance plan themselves and pay for it out of pocket. Their plans, on average, are slightly less expensive than employer-provided plans in urban areas, but they provide much less coverage and have more copayments and deductibles. Unlike their urban counterparts, who often choose health plans for convenience of location or freedom to choose physicians, farmers generally choose plans on the basis of costs and services provided. About 7 percent of farm families are without insurance, and many others are underinsured because they cannot afford to purchase an adequate plan.

摘要

这项针对1482个农场家庭的研究评估了明尼苏达州农场家庭的医疗保险覆盖范围及成本,发现这些家庭购买的保险覆盖范围比城市家庭少,同时为这些保费支付的收入比例更高。超过四分之三接受调查的农场家庭自行购买医疗保险计划并自掏腰包支付费用。他们的保险计划平均而言比城市地区雇主提供的计划略便宜,但覆盖范围要小得多,且有更多的自付费用和免赔额。与城市居民不同,城市居民通常为了就医地点便利或选择医生的自由而选择健康计划,而农民通常根据成本和所提供的服务来选择计划。约7%的农场家庭没有保险,还有许多家庭保险不足,因为他们买不起足够的保险计划。

相似文献

1
Health insurance coverage of Minnesota farm families.明尼苏达农场家庭的医疗保险覆盖范围。
Minn Med. 1990 May;73(5):35-8.
2
Failure to protect: why the individual insurance market is not a viable option for most U.S. families: findings from the Commonwealth Fund Biennial Health Insurance Survey, 2007.保护不力:为何个人保险市场对大多数美国家庭而言并非可行选择:来自英联邦基金会2007年两年一次的医疗保险调查的结果
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2009 Jul;62:1-16.
3
Paying more for less: older adults in the individual insurance market: findings from the Commonwealth Fund Survey of Older Adults.花更多钱却买更少保障:个人保险市场中的老年人:联邦基金老年人调查结果
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2005 Jun(841):1-12.
4
Out-of-pocket health spending by poor and near-poor elderly Medicare beneficiaries.贫困和接近贫困的老年医疗保险受益人的自付医疗费用。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Apr;34(1 Pt 2):241-54.
5
The individual insurance market before reform: low premiums and low benefits.改革前的个人保险市场:保费低,保障低。
Med Care Res Rev. 2011 Oct;68(5):594-606. doi: 10.1177/1077558711399767. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
6
Does public insurance provide better financial protection against rising health care costs for families of children with special health care needs?公共保险能否为有特殊医疗需求儿童的家庭提供更好的经济保障,以应对不断上涨的医疗费用?
Med Care. 2008 Oct;46(10):1064-70. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318185cdf2.
7
Affordable health benefits for workers without employer coverage.为没有雇主提供医保的员工提供负担得起的医保福利。
Res Agenda Brief. 1998 Feb(8):1-11.
8
Comparing the assets of uninsured households to cost sharing under high-deductible health plans.将未参保家庭的资产与高免赔额健康计划下的费用分摊进行比较。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 May-Jun;27(3):w214-21. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.w214. Epub 2008 Apr 15.
9
Variations in health insurance coverage: benefits vs. premiums.
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1984 Winter;62(1):53-81.
10
Progressive or regressive? A second look at the tax exemption for employer-sponsored health insurance premiums.进步还是退步?再审视雇主提供的医疗保险费免税政策。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2009 May;53:1-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Do vouchers improve breast cancer screening rates? Results from a randomized trial.代金券能否提高乳腺癌筛查率?一项随机试验的结果。
Health Serv Res. 1998 Apr;33(1):11-28.