Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington and Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2013;42(4):554-63. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2013.782817. Epub 2013 Apr 5.
This study was conducted to compare the outcomes of a group-based cognitive-behavioral preventive intervention (Positive Thoughts and Actions [PTA]) tailored to youth in middle school with a brief, individually administered supportive intervention (Individual Support Program [ISP]). A randomized, controlled trial was conducted with 120 early adolescents (72 girls, 48 boys; age = 11-15 years) who had elevated depressive symptoms and were selected from a school-based population. Measures of internalizing problems, externalizing problems, personal adjustment, school problems, and interpersonal relations were obtained from parents, youth, and/or teachers at preintervention (Time 1) and postintervention (Time 2, 5-7 months after preintervention). General linear model repeated measures analyses yielded a significant Group × Time interaction on youth-reported, but not parent-reported, depressive symptoms and internalizing symptoms. Youth in the PTA group showed greater decreases following intervention compared to youth who received ISP, yielding effect sizes (Cohen's d) of 0.36 for depressive symptoms, 95% CI [-.02, .73], and 0.44, 95% CI [.05, .82], for internalizing symptoms. PTA youth also showed improvements in their personal adjustment (sense of inadequacy, self-esteem), and parent-reported social skills, but no differences emerged between groups for externalizing symptoms, school problems, or interpersonal relationships. Cognitive-behavioral preventive interventions in which youth engage in personal goal-setting and practice social-emotional skills, such as PTA, may be beneficial for the reduction of depressive symptoms over and above general support and empathy.
本研究旨在比较基于群体的认知行为预防干预(积极思考和行动[PTA])与简短的个体支持干预(个体支持计划[ISP])对中学生的效果。采用随机对照试验,对 120 名有抑郁症状的早期青少年(72 名女孩,48 名男孩;年龄为 11-15 岁)进行了研究,这些青少年是从基于学校的人群中挑选出来的。在干预前(第 1 时间点)和干预后(第 2 时间点,即干预前 5-7 个月),从家长、青少年和/或教师那里获得了内化问题、外化问题、个人适应、学校问题和人际关系的测量结果。一般线性模型重复测量分析得出,在青少年报告的抑郁症状和内化症状上,存在显著的组间×时间交互作用,但在家长报告的抑郁症状和内化症状上则没有。与接受 ISP 的青少年相比,接受 PTA 的青少年在干预后显示出更大的下降,在抑郁症状上产生了 0.36 的效应量(Cohen's d),95%置信区间[-0.02,.73],内化症状的效应量为 0.44,95%置信区间[0.05,.82]。接受 PTA 的青少年在个人适应(不足感、自尊)和家长报告的社交技能方面也有改善,但在外化症状、学校问题或人际关系方面,两组之间没有差异。让青少年参与个人目标设定和实践社交情感技能的认知行为预防干预,如 PTA,可能有助于减轻抑郁症状,而不仅仅是提供一般的支持和同情。