Yap Marie Bee Hui, Cardamone-Breen Mairead C, Rapee Ronald M, Lawrence Katherine A, Mackinnon Andrew J, Mahtani Shireen, Jorm Anthony F
School of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 15;21(8):e13628. doi: 10.2196/13628.
Prevention of depression and anxiety disorders early in life is a global health priority. Evidence on risk and protective factors for youth internalizing disorders indicates that the family represents a strategic setting to target preventive efforts. Despite this evidence base, there is a lack of accessible, cost-effective preventive programs for parents of adolescents. To address this gap, we recently developed the Partners in Parenting (PiP) program-an individually tailored Web-based parenting program targeting evidence-based parenting risk and protective factors for adolescent depression and anxiety disorders. We previously reported the postintervention outcomes of a single-blinded parallel-group superiority randomized controlled trial (RCT) in which PiP was found to significantly improve self-reported parenting compared with an active-control condition (educational factsheets).
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the PiP program on parenting risk and protective factors and symptoms of adolescent depression and anxiety using data from the final assessment time point (12-month follow-up) of this RCT.
Parents (n=359) and adolescents (n=332) were recruited primarily from secondary schools and completed Web-based assessments of parenting and adolescent depression and anxiety symptoms at baseline, postintervention (3 months later), and 12-month follow-up (317 parents, 287 adolescents). Parents in the PiP intervention condition received personalized feedback about their parenting and were recommended a series of up to 9 interactive modules. Control group parents received access to 5 educational factsheets about adolescent development and mental health. Both groups received a weekly 5-min phone call to encourage progress through their program.
Intervention group parents completed an average of 73.7% of their intended program. For the primary outcome of parent-reported parenting, the intervention group showed significantly greater improvement from baseline to 12-month follow-up compared with controls, with a medium effect size (Cohen d=0.51; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.72). When transformed data were used, greater reduction in parent-reported adolescent depressive symptoms was observed in the intervention group (Cohen d=-0.21; 95% CI -0.42 to -0.01). Mediation analyses revealed that these effects were mediated by improvements in parenting (indirect effect b=-0.08; 95% CI -0.16 to -0.01). No other significant intervention effects were found for adolescent-reported parenting or adolescent depression or anxiety symptoms. Both groups showed significant reductions in anxiety (both reporters) and depressive (parent reported) symptoms.
PiP improved self-reported parenting for up to 9 months postintervention, but its effects on adolescent symptoms were less conclusive, and parent-reported changes were not perceived by adolescents. Nonetheless, given its scalability, PiP may be a useful low-cost, sustainable program to empower parents of adolescents.
Australian Clinical Trials Registration Number (ACTRN): 12615000328572; http://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12615000328572.aspx (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6qgsZ3Aqj).
在生命早期预防抑郁和焦虑症是全球卫生重点。关于青少年内化障碍风险和保护因素的证据表明,家庭是开展预防工作的关键场所。尽管有这一证据基础,但针对青少年父母的可及且具成本效益的预防项目却很匮乏。为填补这一空白,我们最近开发了“育儿伙伴”(PiP)项目——一个基于网络的个性化育儿项目,针对青少年抑郁和焦虑症的循证育儿风险及保护因素。我们之前报告了一项单盲平行组优效性随机对照试验(RCT)的干预后结果,该试验发现与积极对照条件(教育资料)相比,PiP能显著改善自我报告的育儿情况。
本研究旨在利用该RCT最终评估时间点(12个月随访)的数据,评估PiP项目对育儿风险和保护因素以及青少年抑郁和焦虑症状的影响。
主要从中学招募了父母(n = 359)和青少年(n = 332),并在基线、干预后(3个月后)和12个月随访时(317名父母,287名青少年)完成了基于网络的育儿及青少年抑郁和焦虑症状评估。PiP干预组的父母收到了关于其育儿情况的个性化反馈,并被推荐了一系列多达9个的互动模块。对照组父母可以获取5份关于青少年发育和心理健康的教育资料。两组均每周接到一个5分钟的电话,以鼓励他们推进项目。
干预组父母平均完成了其预定项目的73.7%。对于父母报告的育儿这一主要结果,与对照组相比,干预组从基线到12个月随访显示出显著更大的改善,效应量中等(科恩d = 0.51;95%CI 0.30至0.72)。当使用转换后的数据时,干预组中父母报告的青少年抑郁症状有更大程度的减轻(科恩d = -0.21;95%CI -0.42至-0.01)。中介分析表明,这些效应是通过育儿方面的改善介导的(间接效应b = -0.08;95%CI -0.16至-0.01)。对于青少年报告的育儿情况或青少年抑郁或焦虑症状,未发现其他显著的干预效应。两组在焦虑(双方报告)和抑郁(父母报告)症状方面均有显著减轻。
PiP在干预后长达9个月的时间里改善了自我报告的育儿情况,但其对青少年症状的影响不太明确,且父母报告的变化未被青少年感知到。尽管如此,鉴于其可扩展性,PiP可能是一个有用的低成本、可持续的项目,可增强青少年父母的能力。
澳大利亚临床试验注册号(ACTRN):12615000328572;http://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12615000328572.aspx(由WebCite存档于http://www.webcitation.org/6qgsZ3Aqj)