Stice Eric, Burton Emily, Bearman Sarah Kate, Rohde Paul
Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, USA.
Behav Res Ther. 2007 May;45(5):863-76. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2006.08.008. Epub 2006 Sep 27.
This trial compared a brief group cognitive-behavioral (CBT) depression prevention program to a waitlist control condition and four placebo or alternative interventions. High-risk adolescents with elevated depressive symptoms (N=225, M age=18, 70% female) were randomized to CBT, supportive-expressive group intervention, bibliotherapy, expressive writing, journaling, or waitlist conditions and completed assessments at baseline, termination, and 1- and 6-month follow-up. All five active interventions showed significantly greater reductions in depressive symptoms at termination than waitlist controls; effects for CBT and bibliotherapy persisted into follow-up. CBT, supportive-expressive, and bibliotherapy participants also showed significantly greater decreases in depressive symptoms than expressive writing and journaling participants at certain follow-up points. Findings suggest there may be multiple ways to reduce depressive symptoms in high-risk adolescents, although expectancies, demand characteristics, and attention may have contributed to the observed effects.
本试验将一个简短的团体认知行为(CBT)抑郁预防项目与一个等待名单对照条件以及四种安慰剂或替代干预措施进行了比较。有抑郁症状加重的高危青少年(N = 225,平均年龄 = 18岁,70%为女性)被随机分配到CBT、支持性表达团体干预、阅读疗法、表达性写作、写日记或等待名单组,并在基线、结束时以及1个月和6个月随访时完成评估。所有五种积极干预措施在结束时的抑郁症状减轻程度均显著大于等待名单对照组;CBT和阅读疗法的效果持续到随访期。在某些随访点,CBT、支持性表达和阅读疗法组的参与者在抑郁症状减轻方面也显著大于表达性写作和写日记组的参与者。研究结果表明,虽然期望、需求特征和注意力可能对观察到的效果有影响,但可能有多种方法可减轻高危青少年的抑郁症状。