Treuer Tamás, Gau Susan Shur-Fen, Méndez Luis, Montgomery William, Monk Julie A, Altin Murat, Wu Shenghu, Lin Chaucer C H, Dueñas Héctor J
Neuroscience Research, Eli Lilly and Company, Budapest, Hungary.
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2013 Apr;23(3):179-93. doi: 10.1089/cap.2012.0093. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
The purpose of this article was to systematically review the literature on stimulant and atomoxetine combination therapy, in particular: 1) Characteristics of patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) given combination therapy, 2) treatment strategies used, 3) efficacy and effectiveness, and 4) safety and tolerability.
Literature databases (MEDLINE(®), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Science Citation Index Expanded, and SciVerse Scopus) were systematically searched using prespecified criteria. Publications describing stimulant and atomoxetine combination therapy in patients with ADHD or healthy volunteers were selected for review. Exclusion criteria were comorbid psychosis, bipolar disorder, epilepsy, or other psychiatric/neurologic diseases that could confound ADHD symptom assessment, or other concomitant medication(s) to treat ADHD symptoms.
Of the 16 publications included for review, 14 reported findings from 3 prospective studies (4 publications), 7 retrospective studies, and 3 narrative reviews/medication algorithms of patients with ADHD. The other two publications reported findings from two prospective studies of healthy volunteers. The main reason for prescribing combination therapy was inadequate response to previous treatment. In the studies of patients with ADHD, if reported, 1) most patients were children/adolescents and male, and had a combined ADHD subtype; 2) methylphenidate was most often used in combination with atomoxetine for treatment augmentation or switch; 3) ADHD symptom control was improved in some, but not all, patients; and 4) there were no serious adverse events.
Published evidence of the off-label use of stimulant and atomoxetine combination therapy is limited because of the small number of publications, heterogeneous study designs (there was only one prospective, randomized controlled trial), small sample sizes, and geographic bias. Existing evidence suggests, but does not confirm, that this drug combination may benefit some, but not all, patients who have tried several ADHD medications without success.
本文旨在系统回顾有关兴奋剂与托莫西汀联合治疗的文献,具体如下:1)接受联合治疗的注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)患者的特征;2)所采用的治疗策略;3)疗效与有效性;4)安全性与耐受性。
按照预先设定的标准,系统检索文献数据库(MEDLINE®、EMBASE、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库、科学引文索引扩展版以及SciVerse Scopus)。选取描述ADHD患者或健康志愿者使用兴奋剂与托莫西汀联合治疗的出版物进行综述。排除标准为合并精神病、双相情感障碍、癫痫或其他可能混淆ADHD症状评估的精神/神经疾病,或用于治疗ADHD症状的其他伴随用药。
纳入综述的16篇出版物中,14篇报告了3项前瞻性研究(4篇出版物)、7项回顾性研究以及3篇ADHD患者的叙述性综述/用药算法的结果。另外两篇出版物报告了两项健康志愿者前瞻性研究的结果。开具联合治疗的主要原因是对先前治疗反应不足。在ADHD患者的研究中(若有报告),1)大多数患者为儿童/青少年且为男性,患有混合型ADHD亚型;2)哌甲酯最常与托莫西汀联合用于增效治疗或换药;3)部分但并非所有患者的ADHD症状得到改善;4)未出现严重不良事件。
由于出版物数量少、研究设计异质性(仅有一项前瞻性随机对照试验)、样本量小以及地域偏差,关于兴奋剂与托莫西汀联合治疗的超说明书用药的已发表证据有限。现有证据表明但未证实,这种药物联合可能使部分但并非所有尝试过多种ADHD药物但未成功的患者受益。