Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.
J Crit Care. 2013 Oct;28(5):884.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.02.011. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
Indirect calorimetry (IC) is increasingly advocated for individualizing nutritional therapy in critically ill adult patients, but questions remain regarding its practical implementation.
During 12 weeks, we prospectively assessed utility and practical aspects of IC use. Adult medico-surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients were daily screened for malnutrition. Indirect calorimetry was planned in subjects considered unable to meet energy requirements on day 3 after admission. Measured energy expenditure (MEE) was compared with calculated (resting/total) energy expenditure.
A total of 940 evaluations were performed in 266 patients (age, 63±16 years; 59% males; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, 14±8). A total of 230 patients (86.5%) were at risk for malnutrition, and in 118 of them, IC was indicated. Practical considerations precluded measurements in 72 cases (61%). Forty-six calorimetric evaluations revealed an MEE of 1649±544 kcal per 24 hours that poorly correlated with calculated resting energy expenditure (r2=0.19) and calculated total energy expenditure (r2=0.20). Indirect calorimetry measurements were not time-consuming.
Indirect calorimetry was indicated in half but effectively performed in only 20% of a representative intensive care unit population at risk for malnutrition. Correlation between MEE and CEE was poor.
Indirect calorimetry is increasingly advocated for individualizing nutritional therapy in critically ill adult patients. Practical feasibility is tested in this study. Large differences between measured and calculated energy expenditure are observed. Together with patients' characteristics, feasibility results can guide clinicians or institutes in using IC in their daily clinical practice.
间接热量测定法(IC)越来越被提倡用于对重症成年患者进行个体化营养治疗,但在其实际应用方面仍存在一些问题。
在 12 周期间,我们前瞻性评估了 IC 使用的实用性和实际方面。对成年内科-外科重症监护病房(ICU)患者进行每日筛查,以确定其是否存在营养不良。如果患者在入院第 3 天仍无法满足能量需求,则计划进行间接热量测定。将实测能量消耗(MEE)与计算的(静息/总)能量消耗进行比较。
共对 266 例患者(年龄 63±16 岁;59%为男性;急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II 评分 14±8)进行了 940 次评估。共有 230 例患者(86.5%)存在营养不良风险,其中 118 例患者需要进行 IC。但由于实际考虑因素,有 72 例(61%)无法进行测量。46 次热量测定显示,24 小时内的 MEE 为 1649±544 kcal,与计算的静息能量消耗(r2=0.19)和总能量消耗(r2=0.20)相关性较差。间接热量测定并不耗时。
在存在营养不良风险的代表性 ICU 人群中,间接热量测定虽被指示,但实际上仅在 20%的患者中有效进行。MEE 与 CEE 之间的相关性较差。
间接热量测定法越来越被提倡用于对重症成年患者进行个体化营养治疗。本研究对其实际可行性进行了测试。实测和计算的能量消耗之间存在较大差异。结合患者的特征,可行性结果可以指导临床医生或医疗机构在日常临床实践中使用 IC。