Bedore Lisa M, Peña Elizabeth D, Summers Connie L, Boerger Karin M, Resendiz Maria D, Greene Kai, Bohman Thomas M, Gillam Ronald B
The University of Texas at Austin.
Biling (Camb Engl). 2012 Jul;15(3):616-629. doi: 10.1017/S1366728912000090. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
The purpose of this study was to determine if different language measures resulted in the same classifications of language dominance and proficiency for a group of bilingual pre-kindergarteners and kindergarteners. Data were analyzed for 1029 Spanish-English bilingual pre-kindergarteners who spanned the full range of bilingual language proficiency. Parent questionnaires were used to quantify age of first exposure and current language use. Scores from a short test of semantic and morphosyntactic development in Spanish and English were used to quantify children's performance. Some children who were in the functionally monolingual range based on interview data demonstrated minimal knowledge of their other languages when tested. Current use accounted for more of the variance in language dominance than did age of first exposure. Results indicate that at different levels of language exposure children differed in their performance on semantic and morphosyntax tasks. These patterns suggest that it may be difficult to compare the results of studies that employ different measures of language dominance and proficiency. Current use is likely to be a useful metric of bilingual development that can be used to build a comprehensive picture of child bilingualism.
本研究的目的是确定对于一组双语学前班儿童和幼儿园儿童而言,不同的语言测量方法是否会得出相同的语言优势和熟练程度分类。对1029名西班牙语-英语双语学前班儿童的数据进行了分析,这些儿童涵盖了双语语言熟练程度的全范围。家长问卷用于量化首次接触语言的年龄和当前的语言使用情况。西班牙语和英语语义及形态句法发展简短测试的分数用于量化儿童的表现。根据访谈数据处于功能单语范围内的一些儿童在测试时对其另一种语言的了解很少。与首次接触语言的年龄相比,当前使用情况在语言优势的差异中占比更大。结果表明,在不同的语言接触水平下,儿童在语义和形态句法任务上的表现存在差异。这些模式表明,比较采用不同语言优势和熟练程度测量方法的研究结果可能会很困难。当前的语言使用情况可能是双语发展的一个有用指标,可用于构建儿童双语能力的全面图景。