Suppr超能文献

神经氨酸酶抑制剂在季节性流感预防和治疗中的价值:系统评价的系统评价。

The value of neuraminidase inhibitors for the prevention and treatment of seasonal influenza: a systematic review of systematic reviews.

机构信息

Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care Antwerp, Centre for General Practice, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e60348. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060348. Epub 2013 Apr 2.

Abstract

Controversy has arisen regarding the effectiveness of neuraminidase inhibitors (NIs), especially against influenza-related complications. A literature search was performed to critically assess the evidence collected by the available systematic reviews (SRs) regarding the benefits and disadvantages of NIs (oseltamivir, zanamivir) compared to placebos in healthy and at-risk individuals of all ages for prophylaxis and treatment of seasonal influenza. A SR was done using the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Health Technology Assessment Database, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and Medline (January 2006-July 2012). Two reviewers selected SRs based on randomized clinical trials, which were restricted to intention-to-treat results, and they assessed review (AMSTAR) and study quality indicators (GRADE). The SRs included (N = 9) were of high quality. The efficacy of NIs in prophylaxis ranged from 64% (16-85) to 92% (37-99); the absolute risk reduction ranged from 1.2% to 12.1% (GRADE moderate to low). Clinically relevant treatment benefits of NIs were small in healthy adults and children suffering from influenza-like illness (GRADE high to moderate). Oseltamivir reduced antibiotic usage in healthy adults according to one SR, but this was not confirmed by other reviews (GRADE low). Zanamivir showed a preventive effect on antibiotic usage in children (95% (77-99);GRADE moderate) and on the occurrence of bronchitis in at-risk individuals (59% (30-76);GRADE moderate). No evidence was available on the treatment benefits of NIs in elderly and at-risk groups and their effects on hospitalization and mortality. In oseltamivir trials, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea were significant side-effects. For zanamivir trials, no adverse effects have been reported. The combination of diagnostic uncertainty, the risk for virus strain resistance, possible side effects and financial cost outweigh the small benefits of oseltamivir or zanamivir for the prophylaxis and treatment of healthy individuals. No relevant benefits of these NIs on complications in at-risk individuals have been established.

摘要

关于神经氨酸酶抑制剂(NIs)的有效性存在争议,尤其是针对与流感相关的并发症。进行了文献检索,以批判性地评估现有系统评价(SR)收集的证据,这些证据涉及 NIs(奥司他韦、扎那米韦)与安慰剂相比在预防和治疗季节性流感方面在所有年龄段的健康和高危个体中的益处和弊端。使用 Cochrane 系统评价数据库、卫生技术评估数据库、效果摘要数据库和 Medline(2006 年 1 月至 2012 年 7 月)进行了一项 SR。两名评审员根据随机临床试验选择了 SR,这些试验仅限于意向治疗结果,并评估了综述(AMSTAR)和研究质量指标(GRADE)。包括的 SR(N=9)质量较高。NIs 在预防方面的疗效范围为 64%(16-85)至 92%(37-99);绝对风险降低范围为 1.2%至 12.1%(GRADE 为中低)。在健康成年人和患有流感样疾病的儿童中,NIs 的临床相关治疗益处较小(GRADE 为高中等)。根据一项 SR,奥司他韦减少了健康成年人的抗生素使用,但其他综述并未证实这一点(GRADE 为低)。扎那米韦在儿童中显示出预防抗生素使用的效果(95%(77-99);GRADE 为中等)和预防高危个体发生支气管炎的效果(59%(30-76);GRADE 为中等)。没有证据表明 NIs 在老年人和高危人群中的治疗益处及其对住院和死亡率的影响。在奥司他韦试验中,恶心、呕吐和腹泻是显著的副作用。在扎那米韦试验中,没有报告不良反应。诊断不确定性、病毒株耐药风险、可能的副作用和经济成本超过了奥司他韦或扎那米韦在预防和治疗健康个体方面的微小益处。尚未确定这些 NIs 对高危个体并发症的相关益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f24/3614893/7e764550e832/pone.0060348.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验