• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

听觉干扰过程:在模拟讲座环境中注意力分散和回忆受损。

The process of auditory distraction: disrupted attention and impaired recall in a simulated lecture environment.

机构信息

University of California.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Sep;39(5):1463-72. doi: 10.1037/a0032190. Epub 2013 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1037/a0032190
PMID:23565786
Abstract

Literature on auditory distraction has generally focused on the effects of particular kinds of sounds on attention to target stimuli. In support of extensive previous findings that have demonstrated the special role of language as an auditory distractor, we found that a concurrent speech stream impaired recall of a short lecture, especially for verbatim language. But impaired recall effects were also found with a variety of nonlinguistic noises, suggesting that neither type of noise nor amplitude and duration of noise are adequate predictors of distraction. Rather, distraction occurred when it was difficult for a listener to process sounds and assemble coherent, differentiable streams of input, one task-salient and attended and the other task-irrelevant and inhibited. In 3 experiments, the effects of auditory distractors during a short spoken lecture were tested. Participants recalled details of the lecture and also reported their opinions of the sound quality. Our findings suggest that distractors that are difficult to designate as either task related or environment related (and therefore irrelevant) draw cognitive processing resources away from a target speech stream during a listening task, impairing recall.

摘要

关于听觉干扰的文献通常集中在特定类型的声音对目标刺激注意的影响上。支持先前广泛的研究结果,即语言作为听觉干扰物的特殊作用,我们发现,同时存在的语音流会干扰对简短演讲的回忆,特别是对逐字逐句的语言。但是,用各种非语言噪音也发现了回忆效果受损的情况,这表明噪音的类型、噪音的幅度和持续时间都不是干扰的充分预测指标。相反,当听众难以处理声音并将输入组合成连贯、可区分的流时,就会发生干扰,一个任务突出并被关注,另一个任务不相关并被抑制。在 3 项实验中,测试了在简短的口头演讲期间听觉干扰物的影响。参与者回忆了演讲的细节,并报告了他们对声音质量的看法。我们的研究结果表明,那些难以指定为与任务相关或与环境相关(因此不相关)的干扰物会在听力任务期间从目标语音流中抽取认知处理资源,从而干扰回忆。

相似文献

1
The process of auditory distraction: disrupted attention and impaired recall in a simulated lecture environment.听觉干扰过程:在模拟讲座环境中注意力分散和回忆受损。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Sep;39(5):1463-72. doi: 10.1037/a0032190. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
2
Dynamic cognitive control of irrelevant sound: Increased task engagement attenuates semantic auditory distraction.无关声音的动态认知控制:任务参与度增加可减轻语义性听觉干扰。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Oct;41(5):1462-74. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000060. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
3
Effects of Auditory Distraction on Face Memory.听觉干扰对面部记忆的影响。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 15;9(1):10185. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46641-7.
4
Time of presentation affects auditory distraction: Changing-state and deviant sounds disrupt similar working memory processes.就诊时间影响听觉分心:变化状态和异常声音会干扰相似的工作记忆过程。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Mar;72(3):457-471. doi: 10.1177/1747021818758239. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
5
Dynamics of distraction: competition among auditory streams modulates gain and disrupts inter-trial phase coherence in the human electroencephalogram.分散注意力的动态:听觉流之间的竞争调节增益并破坏人类脑电图中的试验间相位相干性。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053953. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
6
Sadness increases distraction by auditory deviant stimuli.悲伤会增加对听觉偏差刺激的分心。
Emotion. 2014 Feb;14(1):203-13. doi: 10.1037/a0034289. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
7
Distraction at the cocktail party: Attenuation of the irrelevant speech effect after a training of auditory selective attention.鸡尾酒会上的分心:听觉选择性注意训练后无关言语效应的衰减。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Jan;46(1):10-20. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000695. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
8
Is auditory distraction by changing-state and deviant sounds underpinned by the same mechanism? Evidence from pupillometry.由变化状态和异常声音引起的听觉分心是否由相同机制支撑?来自瞳孔测量法的证据。
Biol Psychol. 2019 Feb;141:64-74. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
9
Effect of Auditory Distractors on Speech Recognition and Listening Effort.听觉干扰对言语识别和聆听努力的影响。
Ear Hear. 2023;44(5):1121-1132. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001356. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
10
Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction.过程而非内容的干扰决定了语义听觉分心。
Cognition. 2009 Jan;110(1):23-38. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.003. Epub 2008 Dec 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Adapting to new challenges in medical education: a three-step digitization approach for blended learning.适应医学教育的新挑战:混合学习的三步数字化方法。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 28;24(1):585. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05503-1.
2
Statistical learning at a virtual cocktail party.在虚拟鸡尾酒会上进行统计学习。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Apr;31(2):849-861. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02384-1. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
3
Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over frontal, parietal and cerebellar cortex for cognitive function during fasting in healthy adults.
经颅直流电刺激额叶、顶叶和小脑皮质对健康成年人禁食期间认知功能的影响。
IBRO Rep. 2020 Apr 25;8:129-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ibror.2020.03.002. eCollection 2020 Jun.
4
Syntactic and non-syntactic sources of interference by music on language processing.音乐对语言处理的句法和非句法干扰源。
Sci Rep. 2018 Dec 17;8(1):17918. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36076-x.
5
Differential Impact of Interference on Internally- and Externally-Directed Attention.干扰对内源性和外源性注意的影响差异。
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 6;8(1):2498. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20498-8.
6
Attentional disengagements in educational contexts: a diary investigation of everyday mind-wandering and distraction.教育情境中的注意力分散:一项关于日常走神和分心的日记式调查。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2017;2(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s41235-017-0070-7. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
7
Aphasia and Auditory Processing after Stroke through an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Lens.从《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》视角看卒中后的失语症与听觉处理
Semin Hear. 2016 Aug;37(3):233-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1584408.