• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

过程而非内容的干扰决定了语义听觉分心。

Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction.

作者信息

Marsh John E, Hughes Robert W, Jones Dylan M

机构信息

School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.

出版信息

Cognition. 2009 Jan;110(1):23-38. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.003. Epub 2008 Dec 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.003
PMID:19081558
Abstract

Distraction by irrelevant background sound of visually-based cognitive tasks illustrates the vulnerability of attentional selectivity across modalities. Four experiments centred on auditory distraction during tests of memory for visually-presented semantic information. Meaningful irrelevant speech disrupted the free recall of semantic category-exemplars more than meaningless irrelevant sound (Experiment 1). This effect was exacerbated when the irrelevant speech was semantically related to the to-be-remembered material (Experiment 2). Importantly, however, these effects of meaningfulness and semantic relatedness were shown to arise only when instructions emphasized recall by category rather than by serial order (Experiments 3 and 4). The results favor a process-oriented, rather than a structural, approach to the breakdown of attentional selectivity and forgetting: performance is impaired by the similarity of process brought to bear on the relevant and irrelevant material, not the similarity in item content.

摘要

基于视觉的认知任务中,不相关背景声音的干扰说明了跨模态注意力选择性的脆弱性。四项实验聚焦于视觉呈现语义信息记忆测试中的听觉干扰。有意义的不相关言语比无意义的不相关声音更能干扰语义类别示例的自由回忆(实验1)。当不相关言语与待记忆材料语义相关时,这种效应会加剧(实验2)。然而,重要的是,只有当指令强调按类别而非按顺序回忆时,才有意义性和语义相关性的这些效应(实验3和实验4)。结果支持一种以过程为导向而非结构导向的注意力选择性和遗忘崩溃的方法:相关材料和不相关材料所涉及过程的相似性会损害表现,而非项目内容的相似性。

相似文献

1
Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction.过程而非内容的干扰决定了语义听觉分心。
Cognition. 2009 Jan;110(1):23-38. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.003. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
2
Hemispheric asymmetries in auditory distraction.听觉分散的半球不对称性。
Brain Cogn. 2010 Nov;74(2):79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.06.007. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
3
The impact of order incongruence between a task-irrelevant auditory sequence and a task-relevant visual sequence.与任务无关的听觉序列和与任务相关的视觉序列之间的顺序不一致的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Apr;31(2):316-27. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.2.316.
4
Towards a cognitive model of distraction by auditory novelty: the role of involuntary attention capture and semantic processing.迈向听觉新奇干扰的认知模型:非自愿注意捕获和语义加工的作用。
Cognition. 2008 Dec;109(3):345-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.09.005. Epub 2008 Nov 12.
5
Broken expectations: violation of expectancies, not novelty, captures auditory attention.期望破裂:违反期望而非新奇性捕获听觉注意。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Jan;38(1):164-77. doi: 10.1037/a0025054. Epub 2011 Sep 5.
6
Disruption of short-term memory by distractor speech: does content matter?干扰性言语对短期记忆的破坏:内容重要吗?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Jan;64(1):146-68. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.483769. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
7
ERP correlates of the irrelevant sound effect.ERP 与无关声音效应的关联。
Psychophysiology. 2010 Nov;47(6):1182-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01029.x.
8
Can the irrelevant speech effect turn into a stimulus suffix effect?无关言语效应会转变为刺激后缀效应吗?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 May;61(5):665-73. doi: 10.1080/17470210701774168.
9
Cross-modal distraction by background speech: what role for meaning?背景语音的跨模态干扰:意义起什么作用?
Noise Health. 2010 Oct-Dec;12(49):210-6. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.70499.
10
Speech versus non-speech as irrelevant sound: controlling acoustic variation.言语与非言语无关声音:控制声学变化。
Biol Psychol. 2010 Sep;85(1):62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.05.004. Epub 2010 May 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Serial recall in spatial acoustic environments: irrelevant sound effect and spatial source alternations.空间声学环境中的序列回忆:无关声音效应与空间声源交替
Sci Rep. 2025 Sep 12;15(1):32473. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-18592-9.
2
Familiar Music Reduces Mind Wandering and Boosts Behavioral Performance During Lexical Semantic Processing.熟悉的音乐可减少词汇语义处理过程中的走神现象并提高行为表现。
Brain Sci. 2025 May 2;15(5):482. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15050482.
3
Working memory capacity as a predictor of text idea recall in multitasking L2 digital reading.
工作记忆容量作为多任务二语数字阅读中文本观点回忆的预测指标。
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2025 May 7;38(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s41155-025-00353-2.
4
Impact of irrelevant speech and non-speech sounds on serial recall of verbal and spatial items in children and adults.无关言语和非言语声音对儿童及成人言语和空间项目系列回忆的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 14;15(1):1951. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85855-w.
5
Attenuated processing of task-irrelevant speech and other auditory stimuli: fMRI evidence from arithmetic tasks.对与任务无关的语音及其他听觉刺激的减弱处理:来自算术任务的功能磁共振成像证据。
Eur J Neurosci. 2024 Dec;60(12):7124-7147. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16616. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
6
Evidence of a metacognitive illusion in stimulus-specific prospective judgments of distraction by background speech.背景言语干扰下刺激特异性前瞻性判断的元认知错觉的证据。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 15;14(1):24111. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74719-4.
7
Impact of background music on reading comprehension: influence of lyrics language and study habits.背景音乐对阅读理解的影响:歌词语言和学习习惯的作用
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 5;15:1363562. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1363562. eCollection 2024.
8
Are acoustics enough? Semantic effects on auditory salience in natural scenes.声学就足够了吗?自然场景中语义对听觉显著性的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 30;14:1276237. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1276237. eCollection 2023.
9
Can synchronised tones facilitate immediate memory for printed lists?同步音能促进对印刷列表的即时记忆吗?
Memory. 2023 Oct;31(9):1163-1175. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2023.2231672. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
10
The effect of classroom environment on literacy development.课堂环境对读写能力发展的影响。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2023 Apr 3;8(1):9. doi: 10.1038/s41539-023-00157-y.