• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

锂中毒:早期消化道去污的价值。

Lithium poisoning: the value of early digestive tract decontamination.

机构信息

CHU Angers, Pôle Médecines Intensives et spécialisées, Centre antipoison et Toxicovigilance, Angers, France.

出版信息

Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2013 May;51(4):243-8. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2013.782409. Epub 2013 Apr 9.

DOI:10.3109/15563650.2013.782409
PMID:23566313
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of early digestive tract decontamination on the severity of acute-on-chronic lithium poisoning (acute poisoning in patients under long-term therapy).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was an observational and retrospective study of acute-on-chronic lithium overdoses recorded by the Angers Poisons and Toxicovigilance Centre between February 2006 and September 2010. The cases of overdose were divided into two groups: those undergoing early decontamination (by sodium polystyrene sulphonate and/or whole bowel irrigation) and those in whom decontamination was delayed (> 12 h) or not performed. Severity was assessed using the Poisoning Severity Score (PSS).

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients met the inclusion requirements, 15 of whom were decontaminated at an early stage. The mean age of the patients did not differ statistically between the two groups (49 vs. 44 years, p = 0.25). The estimated ingested doses in the early decontaminated and comparison groups were 12.75 and 12.73 g, respectively (p = 0.9), and the PSSs during the first 12 h were 0.8 and 0.69 (p = 0.32). Those patients who were early decontaminated had an overall lower PSS (1.07 vs. 1.79; p = 0.001), maintained a higher GCS (14.93 vs. 13.3; p = 0.038), and their highest measured serum lithium levels were much lower (2.39 vs. 4.08 meq/L; p = 0.001) than those in the comparison group. All patients who received early digestive tract decontamination subsequently recovered. Under multivariate analysis, undergoing early digestive tract decontamination was significantly associated with a lower risk of severe poisoning (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.04-0.99; p = 0.049), regardless of the lithium dose ingested or the serum lithium level.

CONCLUSION

Our results thus highlight the usefulness of early digestive tract decontamination. This technique was statistically associated with a reduction in the severity of acute-on-chronic lithium poisoning at a given ingested dose and serum lithium level.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估早期消化道去污对慢性锂中毒急性加重(长期治疗患者的急性中毒)严重程度的影响。

材料与方法

这是一项对昂热中毒和毒物监测中心 2006 年 2 月至 2010 年 9 月期间记录的慢性锂过量摄入的急性加重病例进行的观察性、回顾性研究。将过量病例分为两组:早期去污组(聚苯乙烯磺酸钠和/或全肠道灌洗)和延迟去污组(>12 小时)或未去污组。严重程度采用中毒严重程度评分(PSS)进行评估。

结果

59 例患者符合纳入标准,其中 15 例早期去污。两组患者的平均年龄无统计学差异(49 岁比 44 岁,p=0.25)。早期去污组和对照组估计的摄入剂量分别为 12.75 和 12.73 g(p=0.9),前 12 小时的 PSS 分别为 0.8 和 0.69(p=0.32)。早期去污组患者的总体 PSS 较低(1.07 比 1.79;p=0.001),GCS 较高(14.93 比 13.3;p=0.038),测量的血清锂水平也较低(2.39 比 4.08 meq/L;p=0.001)。所有接受早期消化道去污的患者均恢复。多变量分析显示,早期消化道去污与严重中毒风险降低显著相关(OR,0.21;95%CI,0.04-0.99;p=0.049),与摄入的锂剂量或血清锂水平无关。

结论

我们的研究结果强调了早期消化道去污的有效性。该技术与给定的摄入剂量和血清锂水平下的慢性锂中毒急性加重严重程度降低显著相关。

相似文献

1
Lithium poisoning: the value of early digestive tract decontamination.锂中毒:早期消化道去污的价值。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2013 May;51(4):243-8. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2013.782409. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
2
Early digestive tract decontamination in acute-on-chronic lithium poisoning does not call conventional therapy into question.
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2013 Sep-Oct;51(8):809. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2013.824583. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
3
Response to Letter: lithium poisoning: the value of early digestive tract decontamination.对信件的回复:锂中毒:早期消化道去污的价值
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2013 Sep-Oct;51(8):806. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2013.811590. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
4
Response to Letter: "lithium poisoning: the value of early digestive tract decontamination". Reply.对信件《锂中毒:早期消化道去污的价值》的回复。回复
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2013 Sep-Oct;51(8):807. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2013.811591. Epub 2013 Jun 18.
5
Maintaining lithium elimination is at least as important as early gastrointestinal decontamination in acute-on-chronic poisonings.在慢性中毒急性发作时,维持锂的排泄至少与早期胃肠道去污同样重要。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2013 Sep-Oct;51(8):808. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2013.823201. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
6
Pattern of lithium exposure predicts poisoning severity: evaluation of referrals to a regional poisons unit.锂暴露模式可预测中毒严重程度:对转诊至地区毒物中心病例的评估
QJM. 2007 May;100(5):271-6. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcm017. Epub 2007 Apr 5.
7
Successful treatment of lithium toxicity with sodium polystyrene sulfonate: a retrospective cohort study.成功用聚苯乙烯磺酸鈉治疗锂中毒:一项回顾性队列研究。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2010 Jan;48(1):34-41. doi: 10.3109/15563650903344785.
8
Comparison of patients hemodialyzed for lithium poisoning and those for whom dialysis was recommended by PCC but not done: what lesson can we learn?因锂中毒接受血液透析的患者与经中毒控制中心(PCC)建议但未进行透析的患者的比较:我们能吸取什么教训?
Clin Nephrol. 2000 Nov;54(5):388-92.
9
Unrecognized delayed toxic lithium peak concentration in an acute poisoning with sustained release lithium product.缓释锂产品急性中毒时未被识别的延迟性锂中毒峰值浓度
South Med J. 2007 Mar;100(3):321-3. doi: 10.1097/01.smj.0000257619.25995.c4.
10
Do not Forget Gastrointestinal Decontamination in the Early Management of Lithium Poisoning.
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2017 May;120(5):415-416. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12758. Epub 2017 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Hemodialysis Treatment for Patients with Lithium Poisoning.血液透析治疗锂中毒患者。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 15;19(16):10044. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610044.
2
Management of pharmaceutical and recreational drug poisoning.药物及消遣性毒品中毒的管理
Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Nov 23;10(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00762-9.
3
The Poisoning Severity Score: If It Did Not Exist, We Would Have To Invent It.中毒严重程度评分:如果它不存在,我们就得发明它。
J Med Toxicol. 2017 Jun;13(2):131-134. doi: 10.1007/s13181-017-0614-8. Epub 2017 May 17.
4
Should We Be Using the Poisoning Severity Score?我们应该使用中毒严重程度评分吗?
J Med Toxicol. 2017 Jun;13(2):135-145. doi: 10.1007/s13181-017-0609-5. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
5
Lithium intoxication: Incidence, clinical course and renal function - a population-based retrospective cohort study.锂中毒:发病率、临床病程及肾功能——一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究
J Psychopharmacol. 2016 Oct;30(10):1008-19. doi: 10.1177/0269881116652577. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
6
Hemodialysis for lithium poisoning.锂中毒的血液透析治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 16;2015(9):CD007951. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007951.pub2.
7
Extracorporeal Treatment for Lithium Poisoning: Systematic Review and Recommendations from the EXTRIP Workgroup.锂中毒的体外治疗:EXTRIP工作组的系统评价与建议
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 May 7;10(5):875-87. doi: 10.2215/CJN.10021014. Epub 2015 Jan 12.