Mégarbane Bruno, Oberlin Mathieu, Alvarez Jean-Claude, Balen Frederic, Beaune Sébastien, Bédry Régis, Chauvin Anthony, Claudet Isabelle, Danel Vincent, Debaty Guillaume, Delahaye Arnaud, Deye Nicolas, Gaulier Jean-Michel, Grossenbacher Francis, Hantson Philippe, Jacobs Frédéric, Jaffal Karim, Labadie Magali, Labat Laurence, Langrand Jérôme, Lapostolle Frédéric, Le Conte Philippe, Maignan Maxime, Nisse Patrick, Sauder Philippe, Tournoud Christine, Vodovar Dominique, Voicu Sebastian, Claret Pierre-Géraud, Cerf Charles
Department of Medical and Toxicological Critical Care, Federation of Toxicology, Lariboisière Hospital, AP-HP, INSERM MURS-1144, University of Paris, 2 Rue Ambroise Paré, Paris, 75010, France.
Emergency Department, HuManiS Laboratory (EA7308), University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Nov 23;10(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00762-9.
Poisoning is one of the leading causes of admission to the emergency department and intensive care unit. A large number of epidemiological changes have occurred over the last years such as the exponential growth of new synthetic psychoactive substances. Major progress has also been made in analytical screening and assays, enabling the clinicians to rapidly obtain a definite diagnosis.
A committee composed of 30 experts from five scientific societies, the Société de Réanimation de Langue Française (SRLF), the Société Française de Médecine d'Urgence (SFMU), the Société de Toxicologie Clinique (STC), the Société Française de Toxicologie Analytique (SFTA) and the Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et d'Urgences Pédiatriques (GFRUP) evaluated eight fields: (1) severity assessment and initial triage; (2) diagnostic approach and role of toxicological analyses; (3) supportive care; (4) decontamination; (5) elimination enhancement; (6) place of antidotes; (7) specificities related to recreational drug poisoning; and (8) characteristics of cardiotoxicant poisoning. Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) questions were reviewed and updated as needed, and evidence profiles were generated. Analysis of the literature and formulation of recommendations were then conducted according to the GRADE methodology.
The SRLF-SFMU guideline panel provided 41 statements concerning the management of pharmaceutical and recreational drug poisoning. Ethanol and chemical poisoning were excluded from the scope of these recommendations. After two rounds of discussion and various amendments, a strong consensus was reached for all recommendations. Six of these recommendations had a high level of evidence (GRADE 1±) and six had a low level of evidence (GRADE 2±). Twenty-nine recommendations were in the form of expert opinion recommendations due to the low evidences in the literature.
The experts reached a substantial consensus for several strong recommendations for optimal management of pharmaceutical and recreational drug poisoning, mainly regarding the conditions and effectiveness of naloxone and N-acetylcystein as antidotes to treat opioid and acetaminophen poisoning, respectively.
中毒是急诊室和重症监护病房收治患者的主要原因之一。在过去几年中发生了大量流行病学变化,如新合成精神活性物质呈指数级增长。分析筛查和检测也取得了重大进展,使临床医生能够迅速做出明确诊断。
一个由来自五个科学协会的30名专家组成的委员会,即法国复苏协会(SRLF)、法国急诊医学协会(SFMU)、临床毒理学协会(STC)、法国分析毒理学协会(SFTA)和法语国家儿科复苏与急诊小组(GFRUP),对八个领域进行了评估:(1)严重程度评估和初始分诊;(2)诊断方法和毒理学分析的作用;(3)支持性护理;(4)去污;(5)增强清除;(6)解毒剂的地位;(7)与娱乐性药物中毒相关的特异性;(8)心脏毒性药物中毒的特征。根据需要审查和更新人群、干预措施、对照和结局(PICO)问题,并生成证据概要。然后根据GRADE方法对文献进行分析并制定建议。
SRLF - SFMU指南小组提供了41条关于药物和娱乐性药物中毒管理的声明。乙醇和化学中毒被排除在这些建议的范围之外。经过两轮讨论和多次修订,所有建议都达成了强烈共识。其中六项建议具有高证据水平(GRADE 1±),六项具有低证据水平(GRADE 2±)。由于文献中的证据不足,二十九项建议采用专家意见建议的形式。
专家们就药物和娱乐性药物中毒的最佳管理达成了多项强有力的建议的实质性共识,主要涉及纳洛酮和N - 乙酰半胱氨酸分别作为治疗阿片类药物和对乙酰氨基酚中毒解毒剂的条件和有效性。