• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教育和收入分布的变化以及它们之间的关联是否会影响健康差距的时间比较?基于因果图和模拟的探索。

Can changes in the distributions of and associations between education and income bias temporal comparisons of health disparities? An exploration with causal graphs and simulations.

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 2013 May 1;177(9):870-81. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt041. Epub 2013 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1093/aje/kwt041
PMID:23568593
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4023297/
Abstract

Although socioeconomic position is conceptualized by social epidemiologists as a multidimensional construct, most research on socioeconomic disparities in health uses a limited set of observable indicators (e.g., educational attainment, household income, or occupational class) and typically analyzes and reports gradients in relation to one measure at a time. Societal changes in economic structures over time, however, can lead to changes in distributions of and associations between socioeconomic indicators, as has occurred with income returns to education in the United States over the last 50 years. Consequently, temporal comparisons of socioeconomic disparities from repeated cross-sectional surveys can be affected, particularly when salient dimensions of socioeconomic position are unobserved. We discuss this phenomenon within the framework of measurement error and identify sources of variation that can make identification of socioeconomic change difficult. Using simulations, we explore the utility of the quantile, slope index of inequality, and relative distribution approaches to minimizing bias in temporal comparisons and find that these methods yield correct inferences about temporal change only under limited conditions. We contrast these approaches with the use of an imputation model when validation data for the unobserved socioeconomic indicator exist. We discuss implications for analyzing changing socioeconomic health disparities over time.

摘要

虽然社会流行病学家长期以来将社会经济地位概念化为一个多维结构,但大多数关于健康方面的社会经济差异的研究都使用了有限的一组可观察指标(例如,教育程度、家庭收入或职业阶层),并且通常分析和报告一次与一个指标相关的梯度。然而,随着时间的推移,经济结构的社会变化会导致社会经济指标之间的分布和关联发生变化,正如过去 50 年来美国教育收入回报所发生的那样。因此,来自重复横断面调查的社会经济差异的时间比较可能会受到影响,尤其是当社会经济地位的重要维度未被观察到时。我们在测量误差的框架内讨论了这一现象,并确定了可能使社会经济变化难以识别的变异来源。我们使用模拟探讨了分位数、不平等斜率指数和相对分布方法在最小化时间比较偏差中的效用,发现只有在有限条件下,这些方法才能对时间变化做出正确的推断。我们将这些方法与在未观察到的社会经济指标存在验证数据时使用的插补模型进行了对比。我们讨论了随着时间的推移分析不断变化的社会经济健康差异的影响。

相似文献

1
Can changes in the distributions of and associations between education and income bias temporal comparisons of health disparities? An exploration with causal graphs and simulations.教育和收入分布的变化以及它们之间的关联是否会影响健康差距的时间比较?基于因果图和模拟的探索。
Am J Epidemiol. 2013 May 1;177(9):870-81. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt041. Epub 2013 Apr 7.
2
Invited commentary: Can changes in the distributions of and associations between education and income bias estimates of temporal trends in health disparities?特邀评论:教育和收入分布的变化以及它们之间的关联是否会影响健康差距的时间趋势的偏差估计?
Am J Epidemiol. 2013 May 1;177(9):882-4. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt042. Epub 2013 Apr 7.
3
Socioeconomic inequality in health in the British household panel: Tests of the social causation, health selection and the indirect selection hypothesis using dynamic fixed effects panel models.英国家庭调查中健康方面的社会经济不平等:使用动态固定效应面板模型对社会因果关系、健康选择和间接选择假设的检验
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Feb;150:172-83. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.12.021. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
4
Austin Powers bites back: a cross sectional comparison of US and English national oral health surveys.奥斯汀·鲍尔斯反击:美国和英国全国口腔健康调查的横断面比较。
BMJ. 2015 Dec 16;351:h6543. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6543.
5
Socioeconomic hierarchy and health gradient in Europe: the role of income inequality and of social origins.欧洲的社会经济等级制度与健康梯度:收入不平等和社会出身的作用。
Int J Equity Health. 2015 Nov 14;14:132. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0263-y.
6
Socioeconomic inequalities in dental health among middle-aged adults and the role of behavioral and psychosocial factors: evidence from the Spanish National Health Survey.中年成年人牙齿健康方面的社会经济不平等以及行为和心理社会因素的作用:来自西班牙国家健康调查的证据
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Feb 16;16(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0529-7.
7
Use of oral health care services in the United States: unequal, inequitable-a cross-sectional study.美国口腔保健服务的使用情况:不平等、不公平——一项横断面研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Jul 23;21(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01708-8.
8
Relative index of inequality and slope index of inequality: a structured regression framework for estimation.相对不平等指数和斜率不平等指数:一种用于估计的结构化回归框架。
Epidemiology. 2015 Jul;26(4):518-27. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000311.
9
Temporal trends in socioeconomic inequalities in obesity prevalence among economically-active working-age adults in Scotland between 1995 and 2011: a population-based repeated cross-sectional study.1995年至2011年间苏格兰经济活跃的工作年龄成年人肥胖患病率的社会经济不平等的时间趋势:一项基于人群的重复横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 Jun 18;5(6):e006739. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006739.
10
Education and income - United States, 2009 and 2011.教育与收入——美国,2009年及2011年
MMWR Suppl. 2013 Nov 22;62(3):9-19.

引用本文的文献

1
Socioeconomic Characteristics of Neighborhoods where Youth in Out-of-Home Care Reside.接受家庭外照料的青少年所居住社区的社会经济特征。
J Public Child Welf. 2020;14(3):320-335. doi: 10.1080/15548732.2019.1612817. Epub 2019 May 10.
2
Measuring Child Socio-Economic Position in Birth Cohort Research: The Development of a Novel Standardized Household Income Indicator.测量出生队列研究中儿童的社会经济地位:一种新的标准化家庭收入指标的发展。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 5;17(5):1700. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051700.
3
Are inequities decreasing? Birth registration for children under five in low-income and middle-income countries, 1999-2016.不平等现象正在减少吗?1999 - 2016年低收入和中等收入国家五岁以下儿童的出生登记情况。
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Dec 16;4(6):e001926. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001926. eCollection 2019.
4
Unobserved Heterogeneity of Frailty in the Analysis of Socioeconomic Differences in Health and Mortality.健康与死亡率社会经济差异分析中虚弱的未观察到的异质性。
Eur J Popul. 2016 Jan 25;32(1):55-72. doi: 10.1007/s10680-015-9361-1. eCollection 2016 Feb.
5
How do trends in mortality inequalities by deprivation and education in Scotland and England & Wales compare? A repeat cross-sectional study.苏格兰与英格兰及威尔士在死亡率不平等方面的趋势对比情况如何?一项重复横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 21;7(7):e017590. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017590.
6
EXAMINING SOCIOECONOMIC HEALTH DISPARITIES USING A RANK-DEPENDENT RÉNYI INDEX.使用秩相依雷尼指数研究社会经济健康差异。
Ann Appl Stat. 2015 Jun;9(2):992-1023. doi: 10.1214/15-aoas822.
7
Movin' on Up: Socioeconomic Mobility and the Risk of Delivering a Small-for-Gestational Age Infant.向上流动:社会经济流动性与小于胎龄儿出生风险
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Mar;20(3):613-22. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1860-5.
8
Age at menarche: 50-year socioeconomic trends among US-born black and white women.初潮年龄:美国出生的黑人和白人女性50年的社会经济趋势。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Feb;105(2):388-97. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301936.
9
Number of people in the United States experiencing ambulatory and independent living difficulties.在美国经历非卧床和独立生活困难的人数。
J Soc Work Disabil Rehabil. 2014;13(3):261-77. doi: 10.1080/1536710X.2014.912187.
10
50-year trends in US socioeconomic inequalities in health: US-born Black and White Americans, 1959-2008.1959 - 2008年美国健康状况的社会经济不平等50年趋势:美国出生的黑人和白人
Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Aug;43(4):1294-313. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu047. Epub 2014 Mar 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Shrinking, widening, reversing, and stagnating trends in US socioeconomic inequities in cancer mortality for the total, black, and white populations: 1960-2006.美国全人群、黑人群体和白人群体癌症死亡率的社会经济不平等状况呈现缩小、扩大、逆转和停滞趋势:1960-2006 年。
Cancer Causes Control. 2012 Feb;23(2):297-319. doi: 10.1007/s10552-011-9879-4. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
2
Dramatic increases in obesity and overweight prevalence and body mass index among ethnic-immigrant and social class groups in the United States, 1976-2008.美国 1976-2008 年不同种族移民和社会阶层人群中肥胖症和超重流行率及体重指数的显著增加。
J Community Health. 2011 Feb;36(1):94-110. doi: 10.1007/s10900-010-9287-9.
3
Invited Commentary: Causal diagrams and measurement bias.特邀评论:因果图与测量偏倚
Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Oct 15;170(8):959-62; discussion 963-4. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp293. Epub 2009 Sep 15.
4
Epi + demos + cracy: linking political systems and priorities to the magnitude of health inequities--evidence, gaps, and a research agenda. epi + demos + cracy:将政治制度和优先事项与健康不平等的程度联系起来——证据、差距和研究议程。
Epidemiol Rev. 2009;31:152-77. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxp002. Epub 2009 May 27.
5
Bayesian graphical models for regression on multiple data sets with different variables.用于对具有不同变量的多个数据集进行回归分析的贝叶斯图形模型。
Biostatistics. 2009 Apr;10(2):335-51. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxn041. Epub 2008 Nov 27.
6
Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health.消除一代人之间的差距:通过针对健康的社会决定因素采取行动实现健康公平。
Lancet. 2008 Nov 8;372(9650):1661-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61690-6.
7
The reversal of fortunes: trends in county mortality and cross-county mortality disparities in the United States.命运的逆转:美国各县死亡率趋势及县际死亡率差异
PLoS Med. 2008 Apr 22;5(4):e66. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050066.
8
The fall and rise of US inequities in premature mortality: 1960-2002.1960 - 2002年美国过早死亡率不平等现象的起伏
PLoS Med. 2008 Feb;5(2):e46. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050046.
9
The obesity epidemic in the United States--gender, age, socioeconomic, racial/ethnic, and geographic characteristics: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.美国的肥胖流行——性别、年龄、社会经济、种族/民族及地理特征:一项系统综述与元回归分析
Epidemiol Rev. 2007;29:6-28. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxm007. Epub 2007 May 17.
10
Socioeconomic status in health research: one size does not fit all.健康研究中的社会经济地位:一刀切并不适用。
JAMA. 2005 Dec 14;294(22):2879-88. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.22.2879.