Luger Thomas J, Kammerlander Christian, Benz Maureen, Luger Markus F, Garoscio Ivo
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2012 Sep;3(3):121-8. doi: 10.1177/2151458512470953.
The aim of our study was to investigate the clinical relevance of preoperative acute pain management and cardiovascular stability by ultrasound-guided continuous 3-in-1 nerve block in very elderly patients with hip fracture when compared to epidural anesthesia (PDA).
To study the analgesic effect, we enrolled 37 very elderly patients with hip fractures, of whom 3 patients with dementia had to be excluded. Thus, 34 patients were randomized to 1 of the 3 groups: group A (ultrasound-guided continuous 3-in-1 block, bupivacaine; n = 10, dropout rate: 0), group B (PDA, bupivacaine; n = 14, dropout rate: 8), and group C (systemic pain therapy, piritramide/paracetamol; n = 10, dropout rate: 0). Pain intensity was assessed preoperatively and up to 24 hours postoperatively using a visual analog scale, verbal rating scale, analgesic consumption, scale of well-being, and cardiocirculatory parameters (eg, serum troponin T).
Our data show that in the preoperative period both regional anesthesia (RA) procedures (analgesia responders after 1 hour: 86.7% and 100%; P = .001) were superior to systemic analgesia (analgesia responders: 46.7%), and the rescue medication requirement in the 2 RA groups was significantly lower (P = .02). Serum troponin T level increased only in the systemic analgesia group (P = .04). In the emergency department, the disadvantage of PDA in geriatric patients with hip fracture was the fact that procedures were more complex, resulting in a high dropout rate (57.1%). The use of PDA has to be critically discussed for ethical concerns.
In the specific situation of acute hospital admission, the ultrasound-guided continuous 3-in-1 block appears to be indicated as a stress-free means of providing adequate preoperative pain relief in very elderly patients with hip fracture. However, these findings should be corroborated by studies involving larger numbers of patients.
本研究旨在探讨在高龄髋部骨折患者中,与硬膜外麻醉(PDA)相比,超声引导下连续三合一神经阻滞进行术前急性疼痛管理和心血管稳定的临床相关性。
为研究镇痛效果,我们纳入了37例高龄髋部骨折患者,其中3例痴呆患者被排除。因此,34例患者被随机分为3组中的1组:A组(超声引导下连续三合一阻滞,布比卡因;n = 10,脱落率:0),B组(PDA,布比卡因;n = 14,脱落率:8),C组(全身疼痛治疗,匹米诺定/对乙酰氨基酚;n = 10,脱落率:0)。术前及术后24小时内使用视觉模拟量表、语言评定量表、镇痛药消耗量、幸福感量表和心脏循环参数(如血清肌钙蛋白T)评估疼痛强度。
我们的数据显示,在术前阶段,两种区域麻醉(RA)方法(1小时后镇痛有效者:86.7%和100%;P = 0.001)均优于全身镇痛(镇痛有效者:46.7%),且两个RA组的急救药物需求量显著更低(P = 0.02)。血清肌钙蛋白T水平仅在全身镇痛组升高(P = 0.04)。在急诊科,PDA在老年髋部骨折患者中的缺点是操作更复杂,导致脱落率高(57.1%)。出于伦理考虑,必须对PDA的使用进行严格讨论。
在急性入院的特定情况下,超声引导下连续三合一阻滞似乎是为高龄髋部骨折患者提供充分术前疼痛缓解的无应激手段。然而,这些发现应通过涉及更多患者的研究加以证实。