Suppr超能文献

描述 VBLaST-PT(©)(虚拟基础腹腔镜技能训练器)的学习曲线。

Characterizing the learning curve of the VBLaST-PT(©) (Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Skill Trainer).

机构信息

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2013 Oct;27(10):3603-15. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2932-5. Epub 2013 Apr 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mastering laparoscopic surgical skills requires considerable time and effort. The Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Skill Trainer (VBLaST-PT(©)) is being developed as a computerized version of the peg transfer task of the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) system using virtual reality technology. We assessed the learning curve of trainees on the VBLaST-PT(©) using the cumulative summation (CUSUM) method and compared them with those on the FLS to establish convergent validity for the VBLaST-PT(©).

METHODS

Eighteen medical students from were assigned randomly to one of three groups: control, VBLaST-training, and FLS-training. The VBLaST and the FLS groups performed a total of 150 trials of the peg-transfer task over a 3-week period, 5 days a week. Their CUSUM scores were computed based on predefined performance criteria (junior, intermediate, and senior levels).

RESULTS

Of the six subjects in the VBLaST-training group, five achieved at least the "junior" level, three achieved the "intermediate" level, and one achieved the "senior" level of performance criterion by the end of the 150 trials. In comparison, for the FLS group, three students achieved the "senior" criterion and all six students achieved the "intermediate" and "junior" criteria by the 150th trials. Both the VBLaST-PT(©) and the FLS systems showed significant skill improvement and retention, albeit with system specificity as measured by transfer of learning in the retention test: The VBLaST-trained group performed better on the VBLaST-PT(©) than on FLS (p = 0.003), whereas the FLS-trained group performed better on the FLS than on VBLaST-PT(©) (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

We characterized the learning curve for a virtual peg transfer task on the VBLaST-PT(©) and compared it with the FLS using CUSUM analysis. Subjects in both training groups showed significant improvement in skill performance, but the transfer of training between systems was not significant.

摘要

背景

掌握腹腔镜手术技能需要大量的时间和精力。虚拟基础腹腔镜技能训练器(VBLaST-PT(©))是使用虚拟现实技术开发的一种计算机化的基础腹腔镜手术(FLS)系统的钉转移任务。我们使用累积和(CUSUM)方法评估了 VBLaST-PT(©)上受训者的学习曲线,并将其与 FLS 进行比较,为 VBLaST-PT(©)建立了收敛有效性。

方法

18 名医学生被随机分配到三个组之一:对照组、VBLaST 训练组和 FLS 训练组。VBLaST 和 FLS 组在 3 周的时间内共完成了 150 次钉转移任务,每周 5 天。他们的 CUSUM 分数是根据预先设定的绩效标准(初级、中级和高级)计算的。

结果

在 VBLaST 训练组的 6 名受试者中,有 5 名达到了至少“初级”水平,3 名达到了“中级”水平,1 名达到了“高级”水平。相比之下,在 FLS 组中,有 3 名学生达到了“高级”标准,所有 6 名学生在第 150 次试验中达到了“中级”和“初级”标准。VBLaST-PT(©)和 FLS 系统都显示出显著的技能提高和保留,尽管存在系统特异性,如保留测试中的学习转移:VBLaST 训练组在 VBLaST-PT(©)上的表现优于 FLS(p=0.003),而 FLS 训练组在 FLS 上的表现优于 VBLaST-PT(©)(p=0.002)。

结论

我们描述了 VBLaST-PT(©)上虚拟钉转移任务的学习曲线,并使用 CUSUM 分析将其与 FLS 进行了比较。两个训练组的受试者在技能表现上都有显著提高,但系统之间的训练转移并不显著。

相似文献

1
Characterizing the learning curve of the VBLaST-PT(©) (Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Skill Trainer).
Surg Endosc. 2013 Oct;27(10):3603-15. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2932-5. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
2
Convergent validation and transfer of learning studies of a virtual reality-based pattern cutting simulator.
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1265-1272. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5802-8. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
3
Validation of the VBLaST pattern cutting task: a learning curve study.
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1990-2002. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5895-0. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
4
Characterizing the learning curve of a virtual intracorporeal suturing simulator VBLaST-SS©.
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):3135-3144. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07081-6. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
5
Validation of the VBLaST: A Virtual Peg Transfer Task in Gynecologic Surgeons.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Nov-Dec;22(7):1271-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.07.015. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
6
Validation of the VBLaST peg transfer task: a first step toward an alternate training standard.
Surg Endosc. 2014 Oct;28(10):2856-62. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3538-2. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
7
Face and construct validation of a virtual peg transfer simulator.
Surg Endosc. 2013 May;27(5):1721-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2664-y. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
8
Preliminary evaluation of the pattern cutting and the ligating loop virtual laparoscopic trainers.
Surg Endosc. 2015 Apr;29(4):815-21. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3764-7. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
10
Preliminary face and construct validation study of a virtual basic laparoscopic skill trainer.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010 Mar;20(2):153-7. doi: 10.1089/lap.2009.0030.

引用本文的文献

2
The bibliometric analysis of extended reality in surgical training: Global and Chinese perspective.
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 4;10(5):e27340. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27340. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.
3
Results of single-incision distal biceps tendon repair for early-career upper-extremity surgeons.
JSES Int. 2022 Oct 18;7(1):178-185. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.09.013. eCollection 2023 Jan.
5
Training on a virtual reality cricothyroidotomy simulator improves skills and transfers to a simulated procedure.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2022 Mar 1;7(1):e000826. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2021-000826. eCollection 2022.
6
Virtual Reality in Medical Students' Education: Scoping Review.
JMIR Med Educ. 2022 Feb 2;8(1):e34860. doi: 10.2196/34860.
7
Functional brain connectivity related to surgical skill dexterity in physical and virtual simulation environments.
Neurophotonics. 2021 Jan;8(1):015008. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.8.1.015008. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
8
Teaching surgery novices and trainees advanced laparoscopic suturing: a trial and tribulations.
Surg Endosc. 2021 Oct;35(10):5816-5826. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08067-5. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
10
Training with cognitive load improves performance under similar conditions in a real surgical task.
Am J Surg. 2020 Sep;220(3):620-629. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.02.002. Epub 2020 Feb 10.

本文引用的文献

4
Institution learning curve of laparoscopic colectomy--a multi-dimensional analysis.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012 Apr;27(4):527-33. doi: 10.1007/s00384-011-1358-6. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
5
Learning curve for robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr;26(4):1116-21. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2008-3. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
7
Laparoscopic splenectomy: learning curve comparison between benign and malignant disease.
Surg Innov. 2012 Mar;19(1):27-32. doi: 10.1177/1553350611410891. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
8
Mastery versus the standard proficiency target for basic laparoscopic skill training: effect on skill transfer and retention.
Surg Endosc. 2011 Jul;25(7):2063-70. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1743-9. Epub 2011 May 26.
9
The use of the CUSUM chart method for surveillance of learning effects and quality of care in endovascular procedures.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 May;41(5):679-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.01.003. Epub 2011 Feb 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验