Suppr超能文献

虚拟基础腹腔镜技能训练器的初步面部和结构验证研究

Preliminary face and construct validation study of a virtual basic laparoscopic skill trainer.

作者信息

Sankaranarayanan Ganesh, Lin Henry, Arikatla Venkata S, Mulcare Maureen, Zhang Likun, Derevianko Alexandre, Lim Robert, Fobert David, Cao Caroline, Schwaitzberg Steven D, Jones Daniel B, De Suvranu

机构信息

Department of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Nuclear Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010 Mar;20(2):153-7. doi: 10.1089/lap.2009.0030.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Skill Trainer (VBLaST) is a developing virtual-reality-based surgical skill training system that incorporates several of the tasks of the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) training system. This study aimed to evaluate the face and construct validity of the VBLaST system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine subjects were voluntarily recruited at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA) and classified into two groups: experts (PGY 5, fellow and practicing surgeons) and novice (PGY 1-4). They were then asked to perform three FLS tasks, consisting of peg transfer, pattern cutting, and endoloop, on both the VBLaST and FLS systems. The VBLaST performance scores were automatically computed, while the FLS scores were rated by a trained evaluator. Face validity was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, varying from not realistic/useful (1) to very realistic/useful (5).

RESULTS

Face-validity scores showed that the VBLaST system was significantly realistic in portraying the three FLS tasks (3.95 +/- 0.909), as well as the reality in trocar placement and tool movements (3.67 +/- 0.874). Construct-validity results show that VBLaST was able to differentiate between the expert and novice group (P = 0.015). However, of the two tasks used for evaluating VBLaST, only the peg-transfer task showed a significant difference between the expert and novice groups (P = 0.003). Spearman correlation coefficient analysis between the two scores showed significant correlation for the peg-transfer task (Spearman coefficient 0.364; P = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

VBLaST demonstrated significant face and construct validity. A further set of studies, involving improvement to the current VBLaST system, is needed to thoroughly demonstrate face and construct validity for all the tasks.

摘要

背景

虚拟基础腹腔镜技能训练器(VBLaST)是一种正在开发的基于虚拟现实的外科技能训练系统,它纳入了腹腔镜手术基础(FLS)训练系统的多项任务。本研究旨在评估VBLaST系统的表面效度和结构效度。

材料与方法

在贝斯以色列女执事医疗中心(马萨诸塞州波士顿)自愿招募了39名受试者,并将其分为两组:专家(住院医师第5年、研究员和执业外科医生)和新手(住院医师第1 - 4年)。然后要求他们在VBLaST和FLS系统上执行三项FLS任务,包括移钉、图案切割和内圈套扎。VBLaST的表现分数自动计算得出,而FLS分数由经过培训的评估人员评定。表面效度使用5点李克特量表进行评估,范围从不现实/无用(1)到非常现实/有用(5)。

结果

表面效度分数显示,VBLaST系统在描绘三项FLS任务方面具有显著的现实性(3.95±0.909),以及在套管针放置和工具操作方面的现实性(3.67±0.874)。结构效度结果表明,VBLaST能够区分专家组和新手组(P = 0.015)。然而,在用于评估VBLaST的两项任务中,只有移钉任务在专家组和新手组之间显示出显著差异(P = 0.003)。两项分数之间的斯皮尔曼相关系数分析显示,移钉任务具有显著相关性(斯皮尔曼系数0.364;P = 0.023)。

结论

VBLaST显示出显著的表面效度和结构效度。需要进一步开展一系列研究,包括对当前VBLaST系统进行改进,以全面证明所有任务的表面效度和结构效度。

相似文献

1
Preliminary face and construct validation study of a virtual basic laparoscopic skill trainer.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010 Mar;20(2):153-7. doi: 10.1089/lap.2009.0030.
2
Face and construct validation of a virtual peg transfer simulator.
Surg Endosc. 2013 May;27(5):1721-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2664-y. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
3
Preliminary evaluation of the pattern cutting and the ligating loop virtual laparoscopic trainers.
Surg Endosc. 2015 Apr;29(4):815-21. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3764-7. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
4
Convergent validation and transfer of learning studies of a virtual reality-based pattern cutting simulator.
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1265-1272. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5802-8. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
5
Validation of a virtual intracorporeal suturing simulator.
Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2468-2472. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6531-3. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
6
Characterizing the learning curve of the VBLaST-PT(©) (Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Skill Trainer).
Surg Endosc. 2013 Oct;27(10):3603-15. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2932-5. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
7
Validation of the VBLaST: A Virtual Peg Transfer Task in Gynecologic Surgeons.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Nov-Dec;22(7):1271-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.07.015. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
8
Validation of the VBLaST peg transfer task: a first step toward an alternate training standard.
Surg Endosc. 2014 Oct;28(10):2856-62. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3538-2. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
10
Towards virtual FLS: development of a peg transfer simulator.
Int J Med Robot. 2014 Sep;10(3):344-55. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1534. Epub 2013 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Haptic based fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery simulation for training with objective assessments.
Front Robot AI. 2024 May 30;11:1363952. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1363952. eCollection 2024.
2
Functional brain connectivity related to surgical skill dexterity in physical and virtual simulation environments.
Neurophotonics. 2021 Jan;8(1):015008. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.8.1.015008. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
3
Surgeons With Five or More Actual Cricothyrotomies Perform Significantly Better on a Virtual Reality Simulator.
J Surg Res. 2020 Aug;252:247-254. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.03.021. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
4
A machine learning approach to predict surgical learning curves.
Surgery. 2020 Feb;167(2):321-327. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.10.008. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
5
Objective assessment of surgical skill transfer using non-invasive brain imaging.
Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2485-2494. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6535-z. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
6
Validation of a virtual intracorporeal suturing simulator.
Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2468-2472. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6531-3. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
7
Assessing bimanual motor skills with optical neuroimaging.
Sci Adv. 2018 Oct 3;4(10):eaat3807. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aat3807. eCollection 2018 Oct.
8
Validation of the VBLaST pattern cutting task: a learning curve study.
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1990-2002. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5895-0. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
9
Convergent validation and transfer of learning studies of a virtual reality-based pattern cutting simulator.
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1265-1272. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5802-8. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
10
Face and content validation of a Virtual Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery Trainer (VTEST™).
Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5529-5536. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4917-7. Epub 2016 Apr 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Malpractice carrier underwrites Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery training and testing: a benchmark for patient safety.
Surg Endosc. 2010 Mar;24(3):616-23. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0617-x. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
2
Plug-and-Play Tool Handles for Laparoscopic Surgery Simulators.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;142:28-30.
3
Surgical skills training and simulation.
Curr Probl Surg. 2009 Apr;46(4):271-370. doi: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2008.12.003.
4
Development of the VBLaST: a virtual basic laparoscopic skill trainer.
Int J Med Robot. 2008 Jun;4(2):131-8. doi: 10.1002/rcs.185.
6
Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery.
Ann Surg. 2004 Sep;240(3):518-25; discussion 525-8. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000136941.46529.56.
10
Housestaff performance is improved by participation in a laparoscopic skills curriculum.
Am J Surg. 2002 Dec;184(6):626-9; discussion 629-30. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(02)01096-6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验